Originally Posted by
thei3ug
You are taking people's SUBJECTIVE experiences and claiming they are evidence.
So a guy makes a big change, then notices wear, and immediately attributes the wear to the change. There's no evidence that there is a correlation. None. And this is coming from a guy who appreciates your skepticism.
The best way to prevent wear is not to shoot. Makes sense to me. Barring that, products have a typical finite lifespan. Preventative maintenance is not going to change that, and I have not seen ANY credible evidence that froglube significantly increases or decreases wear over other competitive products. You know what you have to do, you know how much money it costs. Showing photos with no record, no contrast, only the takers WORD that the wear magically appeared is no evidence at all. It's just as big a joke as the people you claim to refute.
People are horrible test instruments. They only notice what they're looking for at the time. That's why we have objective lab tests, to study what actually happened. I don't see any, so I don't get why you keep arguing.