Originally Posted by
Skyyr
What I'm curious of, speaking of attention, is why you wouldn't take pictures of the Noveske barrel, before and after. You show the Kreiger barrel before and after pictures, but then you only show the Noveske's "post" photos, and then compare it to the state of the Kreiger barrel as if they should look the same. I don't think I need to list out the numerous rules of logic, as well as the scientific method, that your implication breaks.
You need to not only show a photo of the Noveske barrel before and after with the 150 round non-break-in period, but you also need to show the same barrel type with a 20-round, one-shot one-clean break in. Without those, your report is seemingly biased and useless to anyone who values logic, to say the least.