I ran a thread on a Burris or Vortex 1-8 and everyone that had both strongly preferred the Burris. It was overwhelmingly in favor of Burris. Glass turrets .....is better
I have been impressed with mine.
PB
Printable View
I ran a thread on a Burris or Vortex 1-8 and everyone that had both strongly preferred the Burris. It was overwhelmingly in favor of Burris. Glass turrets .....is better
I have been impressed with mine.
PB
Thanks for the comments and suggestions. I went ahead and ordered the Burris. I went on the chat for Optics Planet and got the Burris for $1023 plus shipping. I was looking at the Vortex PST as well, but I’m a fan of BDC Reticles.
I know that second focal plane scopes are supposed too be brighter and with that how does the Burris 1-8x SFP illuminated dot reticle stack up against the Aimpoint bright Vortex Razor Gen ll 1-6x?
Sent from my SM-G920T using Tapatalk
No comparison data but I never felt it lacked in the Arizona sun
In the 1-8x I have the FFP reticle, not SFP (I know there is an option for SFP). The FFP is daylight bright, I imagine the SFP would be also. I have the XTRII 1-5x also, which is SFP, and it is VERY daylight bright, at the eye-burning level comparable to max settings on Aimpoint and EOTech.
What is the consensus on the better reticle to get?
I would lean more towards getting the Razor but the reticle does not have range estimation stadia for some strange reason...
Leupold VX6 1-8 CMR2 has ranging, super light and daylight bright but futzy illumination controls? warranty customer service may not be as good?
Burris 1-8 Ballistic Circle Dot has ranging but is about same heavy weight as Razor- warranty customer service may not be as good?