Printable View
I don't even know where to begin with you.
Can you state your purpose/question in one simple straightforward sentence so that perhaps someone can make sense of it and attempt to respond?
So far every one of your posts is not much more than ranting and raving and I'm unsure how anyone is supposed to respond to that.
I like the way [insert brand here] Trucks look. But I trust a mechanic more then myself if that mechanic tells me that said brand is prone to breaking, and having problems. You are making a hollow argument against people with real world experience.
If the combination of quality parts decreases both in the field and out of box failures, then the chart holds every bit of knowledge that you are claiming it doesn't. I realize that is hard for you to wrap your head around, but it really isn't that difficult of a concept. A+B=C.
Maybe you should re-take whatever class gave you an introduction into the Scientific Process.
Would you like a shovel to help you with that hole your digging?
I've been following this thread pretty regularly, and unless you posted your original post prior to 9:00 am Eastern Time, I never saw this picture.Quote:
Originally Posted by dieselgeek
Everything I have read from the detractors up to this point really comes down to my original statement:
Quote:
I think from my personal experience people get a little more attached to their guns (and vehicles) more so then other kinds of kit. It is like an extension of them, and their ego. This has always been odd to me, as I have nothing to prove to anyone but myself, but the male ego is ****ing amazing when it comes to feeling special
That link goes to a post about a parallax tactical barrel installed by the end user. How does BCM figure into that?Quote:
Originally Posted by seacoastnh
We deleted your pic of a BCG because it had no value (as you simply posted a pic of a BCG with comments).Quote:
Originally Posted by dieselgeek
No, it was not obvious which is why we called you on it and your low none technical posts.