Have either of these been tested yet this year? I've been carrying P9HST4 for awhile now, and I'm just curious to see how its performance compares to the P9HST2 in ballistic gel, with and without denim.
Printable View
I don't ever recall seeing the P9HST3 (124+P version of the HST) on Doc's recommended list. I may be wrong. My guess is that he has probably not tested it, as it has performed well in the limited testing I have seen. I would not be hesitant to carry any of the 9mm HST rounds. FWIW, the P9HST1 and P9HST3 are the most readily available HSTvarieties in my area.
I've seen the P9HST4 demoed by ATK twice. In both cases, the performance was about the same as the non +P 147 grain, the P9HST2.
Apologies for the necropost, but Doc did you ever get around to testing the P9HST4 (147 gr +P)? Many thanks.
Not yet.
Sorry to resurrect an old thread....but have you had the chance to test this yet?
Ah...so it is.Thanks.
P9HST2 works as well or better than the P9HST4--I see no reason to use the +P version...
Thanks for the reply. I had found a good deal on some of the P9HST4 but ended up buying 2000 rounds of Winchester RA9TA instead. Hard to beat $398 per thousand in this climate.