Originally Posted by
d90king
Every rifle has an intended role Belmont. You sacrifice 1lb on a rifle that is primarily run static so does the weight really matter? Bolt guns in .308 weigh 3-5 lbs more but that's not a problem. Why is it important when discussing a pound difference on these rifles.
I would much rather give up a pound and have a reliable rifle that shoots anything (it was one of the Brits main requirements in the trials that they get hits out to 800 using the cheapest ammo out there)... The SR25 is a great rifle but it can be finicky and requires much more end user maintinence to maintain reliability. If weight is that big of a factor why not drop the SR25 and buy a LaRue Pred in 7.62. Very light and still gives you the accuracy that the SR gives you.
The MWS is not a run and gun .308 and anyone who thinks it is is not clear on the weapon system. I clearly agree with you that it is heavy and as you can see in my previous post I have even said it might not be the best fit for some shooters needs. I will have multiple .308 gas guns each with their own individual missions and setup for each individual role.. I love variety in firearms of all types. I just want them all to be 100% reliable.
If the MWS didn't have the modularity that it offers it would weigh the same or even less than the SR. I think many are willing to accept the trade off in weight for the added benefits of caliber and barrel change options. And if we are being honest these two rifles have a lot in common...
I have no bias when it comes to quality firearms and can't stand fanboy crap. I have been served very well over the years by Colt, Noveske, LMT, LaRue and even LWRCI... I try not to get wrapped up in one manufacture in today's day of top quality rifle makers.
I think you are a great guy, excellent poster and one who knows his shit, but I do want to keep it real. There is more to a weapon system than just its weight. If folks don't try and turn the MWS into something it's not I believe they will be very well served with one.