Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 52

Thread: Availability of Better Performing 5.56 Self Defense Loads

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,438
    Feedback Score
    12 (100%)
    Here is a bit of info to temper the definition of "better performing". Two police shootings in the Phoenix area last month. Two 55 grain bulk pack ammo bullets, two dead idiots. One of them was shot out of ballisticly challenged 10.3" LE6945. Who would of thunk it...

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,625
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by MK18Pilot View Post
    Here is a bit of info to temper the definition of "better performing". Two police shootings in the Phoenix area last month. Two 55 grain bulk pack ammo bullets, two dead idiots. One of them was shot out of ballisticly challenged 10.3" LE6945. Who would of thunk it...
    Any links to more info on these incidents? Number of shots fired, shot placement, etc?

    "Addressing the problem of shootings by ban or confiscation of non-criminal's guns is like addressing the problem of rape by chopping off the Johnson of everyone who DIDN't rape anyone while not only leaving the rapists' equipment intact, but giving them free viagra to boot." --Me

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    SE FL
    Posts
    14,147
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by MK18Pilot View Post
    Here is a bit of info to temper the definition of "better performing". Two police shootings in the Phoenix area last month. Two 55 grain bulk pack ammo bullets, two dead idiots. One of them was shot out of ballisticly challenged 10.3" LE6945. Who would of thunk it...
    Quote Originally Posted by winfield813@yahoo.com View Post
    Any links to more info on these incidents? Number of shots fired, shot placement, etc?
    Guys, this isn't the thread for this.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    122
    Feedback Score
    0
    Rob,

    Great thread.

    Not sure if you want to add this, but there was some testing done on the 75 gr Privi here: http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_3_16/491816_.html

    You might want to add that to your 'Where intermediate barriers are not a problem' section. If this ammo is deemed unworthy, please delete this post to prevent confusion.


    http://www.ammunitiontogo.com/produc...oducts_id/1491

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    5
    Feedback Score
    0

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    501
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by BufordTJustice View Post
    Molon tested the BVAC 75gr and it is loaded to NATO pressure and velocity.

    The results are under 'HSM 5.56 ammo'. They changed their name to BVAC.

    http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_3_16/40...EAVY_OTMs.html

    i own both 5.56 75gr t1c from bvac AND hsm. they are not one in the same. that crono data posted on ar15.com is true HSM not BVAC. the bvac consistently cronos almost 200 fps slower than the hsm. they are not the same company with a different name. bvac is a couple guys from hsm that had some kind of falling out and left hsm to start their own ammo company.....from what i read. i don't know how factual that is. but i do know the crono data........ and all the 5.56 BVAC that i have shot and cronoed is in fact .223 ammo. the stuff struggles to cycle my 5.56 rifle. all this has turned me off to all 5.56 offerings from bvac. when looking for a good affordable stash of mk318, i looked at bvac's offering. but because of my experience with the 5.56 75gr tap clone......i stay away. your results might be different, but i doubt it. this was from multiple lots of bvac spread out over 1000 rounds or more. it was not just one particular under-loaded lot. do your self a favor and stay away from 5.56 bvac.....unless you have a .223 chamber.
    Last edited by kenndapp; 03-02-12 at 14:54.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    4,370
    Feedback Score
    17 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by kenndapp View Post
    i own both 5.56 75gr t1c from bvac AND hsm. they are not one in the same. that crono data posted on ar15.com is true HSM not BVAC. the bvac consistently cronos almost 200 fps slower than the hsm. they are not the same company with a different name. bvac is a couple guys from hsm that had some kind of falling out and left hsm to start their own ammo company.....from what i read. i don't know how factual that is. but i do know the crono data........ and all the 5.56 BVAC that i have shot and cronoed is in fact .223 ammo.
    Take it up with Molon.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    422
    Feedback Score
    18 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by BufordTJustice View Post
    Brandon,

    Any non-bonded soft point or OTM round will meet your criteria.

    All above listed loads are VERY capable 'target stoppers'. DocGKR's 5.56 duty ammo thread speaks to this.
    Thanks friend. Im looking at Federals 64gr TRU for my sbr load.
    Brandon
    "Blessed be the Lord my strength, which teacheth my hands to war, and my fingers to fight."
    -Psalm 144:1
    "Our houses are protected by the good Lord, and a gun; you might need 'em both, if you show up here not welcome, son."
    -Josh Thompson

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    4,370
    Feedback Score
    17 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by bsmith_shoot View Post
    Thanks friend. Im looking at Federals 64gr TRU for my sbr load.
    Brandon
    NP, bro.

    My agency used to issue the TRU (which is non-bonded) I can confirm that drywall, auto glass, and newer car doors are kryptonite to the TRU. I suppose it would fill the apartment dweller role well. So would the 75gr Hornady TAP round, just so you know.
    Last edited by BufordTJustice; 03-02-12 at 18:01. Reason: Why do I ever edit? SPELLING.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    422
    Feedback Score
    18 (100%)
    Thanks friend, but you may have opened a can of worms, lol. If you dont mind, could you answer a couple ammo related questions I have? I would appreciate it if Rob could chime in also.
    My questions are about HD ammo for SBR's.
    1. I know that shorter barrels create lower velocities, so whats the magic number I should look for? Most manufacturer listed velocities are measured using 16" barrels, but mine is 11.5", so how could I find it out for my weapon?
    2. Should I use heavy rounds, or light? Would my sbr perform best with a 55gr round like TAP, or a 75gr TAP loading?
    3. I know that placement is priority, but having the best ammo for your weapon cant hurt anything. Would a HP, SP, balistic tip, etc..... Be the best target stopper? I will shoot till my targets no longer a threat, but the right ammo might make that happen faster.

    If this is too much to ask, no problem.
    Thanks and God bless,
    Brandon
    "Blessed be the Lord my strength, which teacheth my hands to war, and my fingers to fight."
    -Psalm 144:1
    "Our houses are protected by the good Lord, and a gun; you might need 'em both, if you show up here not welcome, son."
    -Josh Thompson

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •