Poorly written article in the OP. It never really says what the law is exactly, and it seems the devil is in the details.
It does seem that the best way to deal with the SCoI ruling would be to go to SCotUS and get it overturned on 4th grounds?
I understand LEOs concern, but charging homeowners with murder because a raid goes to the wrong house seems unfair.
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Bookmarks