Page 13 of 47 FirstFirst ... 3111213141523 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 130 of 464

Thread: New M&P Shield in 9mm & 40S&W

  1. #121
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    514
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by cheapsandwich View Post
    While I love my M&P's, I dont see how this one does anything more or anything better than the .40c or 9c other than compromise capacity.
    I'm not trading 10+1 or 12+1 for .3 thinner,2 oz lighter and a taller grip frame, I'd rather address my carry system to make the compact possible.
    I feel the same. I do see how this would work better as a bug for some LEOs (like the gentleman mentioned regarding the weight difference at the end of his shift).

    I've become spoiled having so many rounds on tap in such a small package (my M&P9c). With that being said, I'll probably end up with a Shield eventually, as, I am a M&P whore.

  2. #122
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    90
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by jmoney View Post
    am I the only one that still wants a 10mm?
    Nope, you're not the only one. I don't think that we'll ever see an M&P 10.

  3. #123
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    247
    Feedback Score
    31 (100%)
    Il'll pass

  4. #124
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    69
    Feedback Score
    13 (100%)
    I won't be buying one on the 12th, but I will have one soon thereafter.

  5. #125
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    9,930
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by mikeith View Post
    I'm sure it will be removable just like the standard m&p if it bugs you that bad... Just a though
    Which would probably work just fine where I'm at. Removing a safety device may be a legal liability in some jurisdictions.

  6. #126
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,218
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by mlk18 View Post
    I won't be buying one on the 12th, but I will have one soon thereafter.
    I'm not convinced we'll see these anytime soon, maybe mid / late summer at an lgs. I'll most likely pick one up.

  7. #127
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Anna, TX
    Posts
    6,315
    Feedback Score
    26 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cokeman View Post
    Let me guess, looks of a gun aren't important either.
    Nope...pretty is as pretty does.

    Show me where anyone said they were (or weren't) going to buy this gun based on the name.
    Sigh...you got me...no one said they were or weren't going to buy the gun because of the name. Though that really wasn't the point I was making.

    It's still pretty freaking ghey to bitch about the name of a product when it has nice potential to have great function.

    YMMV.
    It is bad policy to fear the resentment of an enemy. -Ethan Allen

  8. #128
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    514
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Nmate View Post
    Nope, you're not the only one. I don't think that we'll ever see an M&P 10.
    S&W has quite a history of well built 10MMs. Never say never.

  9. #129
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,164
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Street Dog View Post
    Here are a few specs. I have a PDF file of the brochure, though I have not seen the pistol in person yet.
    Width 1 inch
    Barrel length, 3.1 inches
    Overall length, 6.1 inches
    Overall height, 4.6 inches
    Weight, 18.5 oz.
    Capacity, 9mm 7 or 8 rounds, 40 S&W, 6 or 7
    If I can figure out how to convert the PDF file so I can post it here I will. Trigger pull is listed at 6.5 pounds.

    That will make it a little big for pocket carry IMO. If it won't go in my pocket, they wasted their time making it smaller, at least for me.
    Go in peace, but be prepared for violence.

  10. #130
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    205
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Gutshot John View Post
    Nope...pretty is as pretty does.



    Sigh...you got me...no one said they were or weren't going to buy the gun because of the name. Though that really wasn't the point I was making.

    It's still pretty freaking ghey to bitch about the name of a product when it has nice potential to have great function.

    YMMV.
    No. It's not. It's completely appropriate to bitch about a stupid name when it's stupid no matter what potential it may have or how excited you are about it. No correlation really.

Page 13 of 47 FirstFirst ... 3111213141523 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •