Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: 9mm pistol barrel twist?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    DFW
    Posts
    460
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)

    9mm pistol barrel twist?

    So what do most pistol manufacturers use as the twist rate in 9mm handguns?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Fort Collins Colorado
    Posts
    2,672
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    glock and HK use about 1 in 10.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    167
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by skyugo View Post
    glock and HK use about 1 in 10.
    Yep. CZ 75 and the like use it as well.

    S&W M&P uses something like 1 in 18.5, IIRC.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Fort Collins Colorado
    Posts
    2,672
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by LightningFast View Post
    Yep. CZ 75 and the like use it as well.

    S&W M&P uses something like 1 in 18.5, IIRC.
    hmm that's quite a bit slower. interesting

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    786
    Feedback Score
    0
    From a gyroscopic stability standpoint, 1-18.5" is plenty. S&W uses 1-18.75" for 38 spl and 357 mag, which use longer, heavier bullets across an extremely wide velocity range with excellent resutls. There are custom barrels that use even slower twists, looking for best accuracy. The 9 mm bullets are relatively short and very easy to stabilize, and the reason 1-10" is the standard is simply tradition, NOT reasoning.

    If the S&W MP 9 mm pistols have some accuracy problems, it is likely due to other reasons, not twist. The vertical spread that some report is an indication of early unlocking.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    167
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by TiroFijo View Post
    From a gyroscopic stability standpoint, 1-18.5" is plenty. S&W uses 1-18.75" for 38 spl and 357 mag, which use longer, heavier bullets across an extremely wide velocity range with excellent resutls. There are custom barrels that use even slower twists, looking for best accuracy. The 9 mm bullets are relatively short and very easy to stabilize, and the reason 1-10" is the standard is simply tradition, NOT reasoning.

    If the S&W MP 9 mm pistols have some accuracy problems, it is likely due to other reasons, not twist. The vertical spread that some report is an indication of early unlocking.
    From what I've researched and gathered, the contrary proves true. High speed video testing showed inconsistent unlocking, not consistently early.
    Also, if stabilization is not the issue... why do almost all M&Ps shoot well with heavier grain bullets (147), but it is a crap-shoot with 115s?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Fort Collins Colorado
    Posts
    2,672
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by TiroFijo View Post
    From a gyroscopic stability standpoint, 1-18.5" is plenty. S&W uses 1-18.75" for 38 spl and 357 mag, which use longer, heavier bullets across an extremely wide velocity range with excellent resutls. There are custom barrels that use even slower twists, looking for best accuracy. The 9 mm bullets are relatively short and very easy to stabilize, and the reason 1-10" is the standard is simply tradition, NOT reasoning.

    If the S&W MP 9 mm pistols have some accuracy problems, it is likely due to other reasons, not twist. The vertical spread that some report is an indication of early unlocking.
    I kind of doubt that twist rate would have a lot of effect one way or the other at pistol velocities and ranges...

    agreed, the m&ps with issues probably have something weird going on at lockup/unlock. Honestly every M&P 9 i've shot (3-4 of em) have been tack drivers though. I always go through a brief period of wanting to ditch my g19 and go full M&P after shooting one.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    516
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by LightningFast View Post
    From what I've researched and gathered, the contrary proves true. High speed video testing showed inconsistent unlocking, not consistently early.
    Also, if stabilization is not the issue... why do almost all M&Ps shoot well with heavier grain bullets (147), but it is a crap-shoot with 115s?
    If a slow twist rate was an issue the opposite would be true.
    115gr would be better than 147gr

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    786
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by LightningFast View Post
    From what I've researched and gathered, the contrary proves true. High speed video testing showed inconsistent unlocking, not consistently early.
    Also, if stabilization is not the issue... why do almost all M&Ps shoot well with heavier grain bullets (147), but it is a crap-shoot with 115s?
    when I read things like "almost all M&Ps" I wonder what is really the statistical certainty of this claim...

    I haven't seen any high speed videos of these pistols, do you have a source or a link? I wonder how "inconsistent unlocking" would happen without the "early" part. I don't see it possible, the unlocking timing is basically fixed based on the momentum equilibrium of the accelerating bullet and powder mass and the mass of the slide+barrel, and the geometry of the unlocking mechanism.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    458
    Feedback Score
    21 (100%)
    When questions of the M&P's 9mm twist rate come up, I always think that if S&W wanted to ensure that the twist rate was not a problem, that instead of doing any calculations and testing, that they should just copy HK and then spend their time worrying about things like unlocking.......

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •