Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: BCG pressure doesn't drop sharply after bullet exits muzzle ??

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    131
    Feedback Score
    0

    BCG pressure doesn't drop sharply after bullet exits muzzle ??

    I have always wondered how long it took BCG expansion chamber pressure to rise after the bullet passed the gas port, and how long it took to fall after the bullet exited the muzzle. I didn't expect much latency at all.

    This paper

    Aberdeen paper - WMWerner

    shows the BCG expansion chamber pressure (which they call the "pressure at the carrier cavity") rising over a period of about .6 millisecond, and falling over 2 ms (see page 29). This is quite a surprise, as we know that dwell time for an m16a1 (which is what they are using) is only about .2 ms.

    The same kind of plot appears on page 23, but the pressure axis is off by a factor of ten. The paper is not very well written. They say that t=0 is the muzzle exit time (which they call the "shot ejection time"), but BCG pressure doesn't start to rise until *after* t=0.


    Anyway, if these measurements are correct, a serious rethinking is in order.

    By the way, the max BCG velocity of about 15 ft/sec given on page 22 is in close accordance with other measurements I have seen, and also with my own modeling.
    Last edited by StainlessSlide; 11-18-12 at 00:33.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    150
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by StainlessSlide View Post
    shows the BCG expansion chamber pressure (which they call the "pressure at the carrier cavity") rising over a period of about .6 millisecond, and falling over 2 ms (see page 29). This is quite a surprise, as we know that dwell time for an m16a1 (which is what they are using) is only about .2 ms.

    The same kind of plot appears on page 23, but the pressure axis is off by a factor of ten. The paper is not very well written. They say that t=0 is the muzzle exit time (which they call the "shot ejection time"), but BCG pressure doesn't start to rise until *after* t=0.
    If you look at the plot on page 23, the carrier starts rearward movement at ~ 0.2 ms after the bullet exits the muzzle. Is this not the (ideal) dwell time?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    32,948
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by StainlessSlide View Post
    Anyway, if these measurements are correct, a serious rethinking is in order.
    Why? What needs to be rethought?
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    northern CA
    Posts
    962
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by markm View Post
    Why? What needs to be rethought?
    that is what Im wondering. What seriously needs rethinking.
    Last edited by jstone; 11-20-12 at 00:17.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    32,948
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    The whole design needs to be scrapped. It's just NOT WORKING!
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    2,540
    Feedback Score
    82 (100%)
    I don't even know why this is a viable thread.

    Notice the DATE:



    I'm pretty sure a lot of stuff has changed since then.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,413
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    A lot has changed since then. However the operating system of an ar15 has not. Still I do not see the problem with how long it takes the pressure to drop.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    8,799
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Some think the bullet is still in the barrel when the action starts moving. Some also think that "dwell time", the time the bullet takes to travel from the gas port to the muzzle makes a difference in BCG velocity.

    While the distance from port to muzzle does make a difference by increasing blow down time after the bullet exits, the time/distance the bullet travels from gas port to muzzle means very little, if anything at all
    The number of folks on my Full Of Shit list grows everyday

    http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n289/SgtSongDog/AR%20Carbine/DSC_0114.jpg
    I am American

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    8,799
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    If it doesn't matter, why hang out in the technical discussion forum?
    The number of folks on my Full Of Shit list grows everyday

    http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n289/SgtSongDog/AR%20Carbine/DSC_0114.jpg
    I am American

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    150
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by markm View Post
    The whole design needs to be scrapped. It's just NOT WORKING!

    Concur. Configure into something of a piston-operated system, for reliability.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •