Kel-Tec AR pistol

[skywarrior]

http://www.americanrifleman.org/arti...plr-16-review/

Saw this today. Don't think its for me.

[Todd00000]

The price is right, and it's nice not having a buffer tube sticking out the back.

[tfltackdriver]

Not an AR design. Not in pistol caliber. All around fail.

[MFWIC2]

Kel-Tec=Not for me. Use the money on something of quality and reliability.

[ryr8828]

This is a strange thread. Guy makes his first post giving a link of a magazine article and bashing a keltec.
Then others who probably haven't even held a plr16 bash it.

It's a sub $500 range toy, not a defensive weapon. It's fun to shoot.

In before the lock...

[Tig]

This is a strange thread. Guy makes his first post giving a link of a magazine article and bashing a keltec.
Then others who probably haven't even held a plr16 bash it.

It's a sub $500 range toy, not a defensive weapon. It's fun to shoot.

In before the lock...

I was thinking the same thing.
Though, I have not shot one. I have read a lot of reviews about them being a fun little gun. Not much negative said, well, other than it being a KelTec.
I think its pretty cool and would be a fun shooter.

[jmp45]

A bit off topic.. If a VHG on an AR pistol requires a tax stamp, would that also apply the same for a Magpul AFG or KAC handstop?

[Quiet]

A bit off topic.. If a VHG on an AR pistol requires a tax stamp, would that also apply the same for a Magpul AFG or KAC handstop?

No.

BATFE NFA branch is okay with horizontal and angled forgrips on handguns.
Vertical forward grips on handguns require BATFE approval/tax stamp due to being an AOW.

There's a BATFE NFA branch letter floating around that states Magpul AFG is legal on a pistol.

[jmp45]

No.

BATFE NFA branch is okay with horizontal and angled forgrips on handguns.
Vertical forward grips on handguns require BATFE approval/tax stamp due to being an AOW.

There's a BATFE NFA branch letter floating around that states Magpul AFG is legal on a pistol.

Thanks Quiet.

[turboedbug]

thats a cool looking pistol