Page 5 of 15 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 143

Thread: "Truing" an AR's receiver face?

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Roaming
    Posts
    889
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by T2C View Post
    If the windage adjustment is not centered on a zero wind day, it most likely is a barrel index problem.
    A receiver that is out of square .002" side to side and the extension fits loose in the receiver bore will point the barrel off .032" in the length of the barrel. At 100 yards that is 7.2"
    Mega and Vltor receivers in my experience have smaller bores. The extensions must be tapped in which holds them straight by the OD of the extension where a loose fit extension is aligned by the flange on the front of the extension and face of the receiver.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    E WA
    Posts
    148
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by constructor View Post
    A receiver that is out of square .002" side to side and the extension fits loose in the receiver bore will point the barrel off .032" in the length of the barrel. At 100 yards that is 7.2"
    Mega and Vltor receivers in my experience have smaller bores. The extensions must be tapped in which holds them straight by the OD of the extension where a loose fit extension is aligned by the flange on the front of the extension and face of the receiver.
    Quote Originally Posted by constructor View Post
    ETA- If the barrel extension is a tight fit to the bore and must be lightly tapped in like is common with Mega receivers the face does not really need to be trued since the receiver bore holds the extension square.
    These two statements make me feel better.

    The SPR upper I built the barrel had to be tapped into the receiver.
    I didn't lap the face.
    That upper turned out VERY well and the BUIS and scope are centered in their adjustments and accuracy is fantastic.

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    39
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by constructor View Post
    John has also told me that all you need to win a high power comp is a barrel that will shoot 3/4" groups.

    Two questions for you since truing the receiver makes no difference.
    Why do some guys have to adjust their rear iron sight all the way to one side to get on target?
    If the extension is crooked .002" across the face do all of the bolt lugs bare evenly on the lugs of the extension?

    1. I am not the author, the author is Bob.
    2. I do not agree that lapping is completely unnecessary. I believe it can be preferable when indexing or when the lack of squareness exceeds or limits the adjustability of the sight.
    3. Otherwise with regard to accuracy, it sounds like those with the talent to notice any difference do not see it as a high priority.
    4. Sight rail, if it is so out of square that it limits adjustability then it is an issue. The incidence of unsatisfactory uppers from tier one shops appears localized to their competitors.
    5. Committing additional resources but receiving no additional benefit is impractical.


    Krampus
    Last edited by Krampus; 11-29-14 at 15:01.

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    CONUS
    Posts
    6,001
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Failure2Stop View Post
    Or a canted or curved forward rail.
    That's a fact. I have also seen at least one FSB canted, because the holes were not drilled properly for the tapered pins.

    I have not run into a windage issue, because the receiver face was not perfectly square. Not yet.
    Train 2 Win

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    STL
    Posts
    176
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    Given the hardness difference between the barrel and the receiver, it would take a significant misalignment of the receiver face to affect the barrel alignment. When the barrel nut is torqued, the barrel extension face would deform any minute high spots.

    I would suspect the concentricity/runout of the receiver threads vs the mounting hole for the barrel to be rather important.

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    4,371
    Feedback Score
    17 (100%)
    As constructor said, ensuring that the bolt lugs bear equally on the barrel extension is enough, in and of itself, for me to take the 15 minutes required to lap the receiver face (with a cold burr in my hand).
    "That thing looks about as enjoyable as a bowl of exploding dicks." - Magic_Salad0892

    "The body cannot go where the mind has not already been."

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    1,111
    Feedback Score
    0
    I have mandrels that hold both 223 sized and 308 sized AR receivers in the lathe.

    I measure face runout in the lathe like this:


    I typically see 0.0015" runout on your average receiver and I have measured a bunch of them.

    I make them straight/square in the lathe like this:
    Randall Rausch
    AR15 Barrel Guru

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    32,973
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Do you think the Brownells tool is worth it for us do it yourselfers?
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    19
    Feedback Score
    0
    I have one - bought it with the Brownell's lapping compound - and have used it with success. Had one receiver that when zeroed, the rear sight was cranked all the way right - after "truing" the front, it brought the sight just about centered when zeroed.

    I've chucked this in my drill press, and found it makes more of a mess than I'd like - it sprays the lapping compound and lube all over - so I've been doing it by hand. It takes a while, but I don't mind. If I had to do a bunch of uppers, I may think otherwise, but for the amount I put together, it doesn't bother me.

    And given the numbers that I put together, I pretty much do all of them.

    Hope this helps,

    rd

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    32,973
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by rubber ducky View Post
    Hope this helps,
    Yes. It does. Thanks.
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

Page 5 of 15 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •