Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 27

Thread: First time firing my Colt

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    8,799
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Shoot 1500 rounds and your trigger will smooth itself out. While that gets you familiar with the carbine- a good thing to be sure- that's a $750 trigger job!

    The best thing to do is remove the fire control group from the lower, clean & degrease it thoroughly and lube the sears, pivot points and the bottom curve of the hammer and reinstall it. Don't stone anything because the parts are case hardened and sometimes rather thinly. Go just a hair too deep and cut through the case hardening to expose the softer metal, you'll start having doubles, triples and other FCG problems before you can say "What the-?" Lubing the parts will eliminate nearly all the grittiness in the take up and the trigger break will be very predictable. It's the best and cheapest trigger job you can do to your AR.

    Here's a link that will show you how to reinstall the FCG. It's a Geissele trigger but the standard AR installs the same way
    https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=72111
    The number of folks on my Full Of Shit list grows everyday

    http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n289/SgtSongDog/AR%20Carbine/DSC_0114.jpg
    I am American

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    75
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Good luck only upgrading the sights haha... Every AR I've owned, I probably reached the "Ok that's it, I'm done spending money on this thing" stage about a dozen times haha

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    32
    Feedback Score
    0

    Front Sight Post = 6 MOA?

    I've been trying to nail that little factoid down for a while. Are you sure that's right?

    Quote Originally Posted by sinlessorrow View Post
    Good shooting. If I remember correctly the front post on the AR-15 is actually a 6MOA post.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    4,654
    Feedback Score
    11 (92%)
    Quote Originally Posted by CatBacker88 View Post
    I've been trying to nail that little factoid down for a while. Are you sure that's right?
    That sounds about right... But you should be floating the target at that range. This ain't a pistol at pistol ranges! If you cover the target with a 6 moa post at 300 you are looking at covering 18" of the target. Look hard at the target and less at the sight. GH

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,742
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by GH41 View Post
    Look hard at the target and less at the sight. GH

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    CONUS
    Posts
    6,001
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    If you want to check the accuracy potential of your new carbine, I suggest raising the elevation 3 clicks and shooting 6 o'clock hold on a SR-1 target. I like to use a Line Of White Hold. You can find the repair center on PDF format by searching the internet.

    Your focus should be on the front sight. The rear sight and target will appear to be a little out of focus, but this is normal. When your shot breaks, hold the trigger to the rear and stay focused on the front sight until you have recovered from recoil and you have a perfect sight picture. Then count to three before releasing the trigger and moving your focus away from the front sight.

    My advice is for precision shooting, not combat shooting. This will give you a good idea of how well your rifle can shoot. When you leave the range, set the elevation to where you want it for holding POA = POI at 100 yards.
    Last edited by T2C; 08-13-13 at 08:59.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Hickville
    Posts
    346
    Feedback Score
    0
    I wouldn't call approximately 6 MOA that good. A nicer trigger or a scope will help, but if you're getting that kind of grouping with bags or some kind of support, bipod/tripod then your barrel is a bit out of spec. Hopefully the next range trip will show some improvement since I'd hate to have a carbine perform worse than 2.5 MOA at the bench.
    ˇˇKawaii Desu Ne Haruhi-Chan!!

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    4,130
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Without knowing the ammo, the shooter's experience, etc. it's pretty tough to condemn the rifle. As I age my eyesight has caused my groups with irons to slip considerably. I evaluate my rifles by mounting scopes on them. I evaluate myself using irons.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    186
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by GH41 View Post
    That sounds about right... But you should be floating the target at that range. This ain't a pistol at pistol ranges! If you cover the target with a 6 moa post at 300 you are looking at covering 18" of the target. Look hard at the target and less at the sight. GH
    I'm sorry, but I have to disagree. With proper sight picture, one focuses on the front sight post.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Hickville
    Posts
    346
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by AKDoug View Post
    Without knowing the ammo, the shooter's experience, etc. it's pretty tough to condemn the rifle. As I age my eyesight has caused my groups with irons to slip considerably. I evaluate my rifles by mounting scopes on them. I evaluate myself using irons.
    Yeah, it would be nice if we were given more details on the way this rifle was sighted in. I assume he was using at least a table for support but it's hard to say what's going on with such sparse details.
    Last edited by Tzintzuntzan; 08-13-13 at 12:54.
    ˇˇKawaii Desu Ne Haruhi-Chan!!

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •