Has anyone seen the titanium bolt carriers yet? Listed specs show it as being a little heavier than the Boomfab but it is cheaper.
http://www.v7weaponsystems.com/colle...tanium-carrier
Has anyone seen the titanium bolt carriers yet? Listed specs show it as being a little heavier than the Boomfab but it is cheaper.
http://www.v7weaponsystems.com/colle...tanium-carrier
“The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles."
"That thing looks about as enjoyable as a bowl of exploding dicks." - Magic_Salad0892
"The body cannot go where the mind has not already been."
Is 9310 not a suitable bolt material? JP has been using it for years but I don't know anything about it otherwise. Ruger is also using it in the AR556 line and had factory test guns with somewhere around 20,000 rounds fired before failure.
Regardless, the V7 carrier is available with and without a bolt so the purchaser can use whichever bolt he wishes.
I talked to Joel briefly and asked him about any galling issues with ti versus a steel hammer or an aluminum upper. He says the carrier's finish will negate any concerns in this regard.
“The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles."
There have been several recent failures on 9310 bolts. Markm had one recently too, IIRC.
Maybe it's the manufacturers not having the large body of knowledge in how to work with, machine, stress relieve, heat treat the 9310 for use in an AR bolt add we have for Carpenter 158.
Also, it's not the material called out in the TDP for the bolt. Only carpenter 158 is mentioned. One can find an older version of the TDP on Google docs if they look hard enough. 9310 is also significantly cheaper than carpenter 158, and can be bought in far smaller batches.
I'm not opposed to using better materials. Im opposed to substituting something for C158 that is "just as good as" without adequate research. When companies like aim surplus, palmetto state armory, etc decide to use 9310 over C158 and companies like Noveske/BCM/DD/COLT don't, that's indicative to me of which is the better material.
"That thing looks about as enjoyable as a bowl of exploding dicks." - Magic_Salad0892
"The body cannot go where the mind has not already been."
Their cryogenically treated C-158 bolts are where it is at, IMO. But that said I am confidant that a 9310 bolt done right is comparable to C158 after talking to a couple industry professionals I respect, Joel being one of them.
"That thing looks about as enjoyable as a bowl of exploding dicks." - Magic_Salad0892
"The body cannot go where the mind has not already been."
Bookmarks