Originally Posted by
Fox33
I hope you are willing to field or forward questions because I have a bunch
Note I have read the Sep 2011 spec sheet for the mk17 from front to back and have a pretty decent amount of time under a mk17
#1 why in the absolute **** did they not go with a SR-25 pattern magazine (or at least an FAL) ** That was FN Herstal wanted to do, we (FNH USA ) tried to sway them, but mother Herstal is the end all be all, unfortunately in this instance.
#2 why the itty bitty parts and leaf springs to retain the barrels (BTW NFW would I ever change the barrel in the ORP) **If you found the itty bitty leaf springs, you removed the barrel retention screw housing, which is not what you do to remove the barrel. The screws are retained in the housing, and are captured. There are 6 screws, 2 in the lower housing (barrel extension) and two all the way closest to the muzzle. NOTHING should come off the rifle when changing barrels.
#3 how did they over come the heat issues the gun was having early on, and in my opinion still has **There was (by Crane) deemed a real 'heat" issue per se. The firing schedule for the testing required 30 round full auto mag dumps, and while gloves were used, the heat was really an issue after a full combat load was expended, and as you could expect, the gas block and barrel were hot, much like any other rifle that has gone through that firing schedule. DO they get hot, absolutely, no question, but hotter than another, I do not have testing results to show either way, sorry. I left that information in the office when I left, it was shop property. I will inquire to find out more for you.
#4 why the polymer lower ** The original aluminum trigger module guns needed to shed weight to meet the threshold requirements for weigh, as while trying to meet the objective weight, it was realized that the same polymer used in P90's, glocks and other polymer firearms components at the time were strong enough to be used for the trigger module since it didn't take the operating stresses during operation. In addition to that, it was realized that once the molds were cut and finalized and lowers were turned out, it was more cost effective. No machining costs, aluminum costs and coatings cost.
I dont want you to think at I am drilling you, but I'd love to hear these questions answered. I think the SCAR platform is a really good gun that could be awesome once the issues it has are worked out.
Bookmarks