I think it would be the MK5 for me. I just wish it was four-five ounces lighter. I don't want rails machined in at 3,6, and 9 O'clock. I always liked the Mk1, but the weight bothered me a bit. Something like an 11 inch would be good too.
I think it would be the MK5 for me. I just wish it was four-five ounces lighter. I don't want rails machined in at 3,6, and 9 O'clock. I always liked the Mk1, but the weight bothered me a bit. Something like an 11 inch would be good too.
Last edited by ScottsBad; 05-27-14 at 11:34.
Have you picked up a new BCM KMR. Saw one in my local gunshop the other day. I could not believe how light it was.
There is a new accuracy improvement update to download for the FLIR RS scope available on the FLIR Personal Systems Resource site, the new MOA table is included in the download in a Microsoft Word file....
http://www.flir.com/cvs/americas/en/...view/?id=53129
MAn I hope Mr Geissele does a limited run re-release of the Mk1 Mod0. I like all their rails, but the original was a work of art. I own one, I should have grabbed two.
duplicate post
Last edited by luckydube56; 06-28-14 at 01:52. Reason: duplicate
I am trying to understand the preference in Geissele rails for relatively large outer diameter compared to some very popular much slimmer designs from other manufacturers. For example, the new Mk8 has a stated 1.97 inch OD compared to the BCM KMR’s 1.5 inch OD. I understand different people have different tastes as far as handguard width is concerned, but I’m curious as to what technical advantages encourage the SMR designs to have larger diameters? Do the larger diameters facilitate a better strength to weight ratios? Heat mitigation advantages? Are the 1.9-2.11 inch diameters common in most SMR rails considered more ideal for weapons handling for most individuals compared to smaller diameter rails?
duplicate post
Bookmarks