Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 100

Thread: Black Hills tipped SMK's 77 and 175

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    261
    Feedback Score
    21 (100%)

    Black Hills tipped SMK's 77 and 175

    Wow! I really like the claims...I hope they are correct. Have any of you got your hands on either of these? Any info will be greatly appreciated.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ofhSLVdk_ik
    Colt Armorer Course, 2004
    Remington Factory LE Armorer School (870, 1187, and 700), 2008, 2013
    Remington 870 LE Armorer course, 2017
    Specialized Armament M16 / M4 / AR-15® Advanced Armorer Course, 2012, 2016
    Glock Armorer Course, 2012, 2016
    S&W M&P 15 Armorer Course, 2013, 2019

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    32,964
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    I'd love to try both of those bullets. NOT in BH's loading, but as a component. 2 MOA at 1000m? That's an impressive gain.
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    261
    Feedback Score
    21 (100%)
    Well I'm in line for 2 cases of the 175 grain tipped SMK in .308...I think they said 2nd quarter (can't remember now). Can't wait to compare it to Federal GMM 175 grain SMK in .308 and Federal GMM 175 grain SMK in 7.62x51 (Mk316).

    I have a range that goes out to 1400 meters...so i will be able to stretch its legs...however its a waiting game at this point.
    Colt Armorer Course, 2004
    Remington Factory LE Armorer School (870, 1187, and 700), 2008, 2013
    Remington 870 LE Armorer course, 2017
    Specialized Armament M16 / M4 / AR-15® Advanced Armorer Course, 2012, 2016
    Glock Armorer Course, 2012, 2016
    S&W M&P 15 Armorer Course, 2013, 2019

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    359
    Feedback Score
    0
    Sounds like it's a Black Hills specific bullet. I hope they get offered as a component by Sierra. I would think it could happen since a polymer tip isn't a exactly a new development but it may be like the 50 gr Barnes bullet in 5.56 that was built to BH specs and is controlled by them. I guess it all comes down to whatever agreement BH and Sierra have (yeah I know, duh).

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    315
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    So sierra made an amax, good for them
    Misspelled and missing words delivered to you via the hunt-and-peck method on my phone

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    1,760
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by 1slow01Z71 View Post
    So sierra made an amax, good for them
    Not really. I expect them to be more expensive than the AMAX, but the .224 has a lower BC and the .308 a much higher BC. More importantly the 77gr tipped SMK will fit in an AR mag, the 75 AMAX won't really do that. The TSMK 175 has a higher BC than the Hornady 178 BTHP or the 175 Berger OTM.

    All in all, good developments.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    NW Iowa
    Posts
    722
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JimmyB62 View Post
    Sounds like it's a Black Hills specific bullet. I hope they get offered as a component by Sierra. I would think it could happen since a polymer tip isn't a exactly a new development but it may be like the 50 gr Barnes bullet in 5.56 that was built to BH specs and is controlled by them. I guess it all comes down to whatever agreement BH and Sierra have (yeah I know, duh).
    If we scream loud enough, Sierra will make it. Time to start sending emails again...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    32,964
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Pappabear suggested we buy some and pull the bullets to see if we can make good ammo with them.
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    5,159
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    I certainly hope this thread isn't what got Mark banned. He said nothing out of line. If it is, it doesn't reflect positively upon the powers that be. Like it or not, Mark is a knowledgeable member of this forum and I for one, have probably learned more about reloading from him than most others.

    Jstone - we can't afford to lose you either. Sad to say but you may have to self censor your opinions too.
    Quote Originally Posted by JSantoro View Post
    Stop dicking the dog, please. It's gross.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    TEXAS
    Posts
    1,507
    Feedback Score
    13 (100%)
    I have never had a problem with Black Hills ammo. I don't have much experience with them either since I reload 99% of my ammo. I have bought exactly 100 rounds of Black Hills ammo over the last few years. 5.56 77gr OTM (Mk262) to use as a benchmark and these new 5.56 77gr TMK. I don't ever see myself buying much more of it since I do reload so much. But I have never had a problem with any of their products. My only real gripe is price, but its along the same pricing plane as all match ammo...

    Most (not all) "match" ammo is just a match bullet stuffed in a case loaded to the same standards as blasting ammo. I think Black Hills goes beyond that and truly tries to produce the best bulk match ammo possible.
    Last edited by Onyx Z; 10-30-14 at 09:42.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •