Originally Posted by
twl
I think it all depends on what a person wants to define as "Tier 1".
If "Tier 1" means that the units are supplied to the government for the military for general issue, then that, by default, places Colt and FN as the obvious choices. Because they meet the requirements set forth by the TDP, as defined in their contract.
Now, as Grant pointed out earlier, there might be some things available that provide different things on the gun that the TDP does not include. And these things might even be improvements over the standard issue "Tier 1" guns.
Maybe you feel that way, and maybe you don't.
However, the definition that you use as your benchmark, will set the determination of who is "Tier 1".
If the TDP was used exclusively as the benchmark, then nothing would ever improve. Everybody would just become a production shop, following the TDP exactly, and all R&D would cease, except for gov't testing. The gun would essentially become "static", or "set in stone" at that point, virtually ensuring its obsolescence.
IMO, there are things "better than TDP", and I'm glad that there are.
Bookmarks