So, as far as I can tell from what I am reading here, Vickers, Hackathorn and Yam have finally caught-up to James Yeager's thinking on handguns.
Let those who are fond of blaming and finding fault, while they sit safely at home, ask, ‘Why did you not do thus and so?’I wish they were on this voyage; I well believe that another voyage of a different kind awaits them.”
Christopher Columbus
Regardless of who says what, until something truly does it better for me-I ll stay with with my 1911s. Mine have been glock reliable without the parts breakages and recalls. If I want capacity and give up concealment those options exist too. Like the AR platform. Been around along time but for my needs there is no reason to leave it yet. My experiences. And mine matter the most to me.
Until you get your shirt caught between the hammer and the firing pin. (Haven't done it myself, but I've known folks who have.)
I had a thought this morning while walking my dog…
Are we talking about safety or reliability and durability including under less than ideal conditions?
There aren't very many folks who feel that any single action-only pistol is safer than a striker-fired pistol or a double-action pistol or revolver. Although that's not a comparison anybody has been making.
" Nil desperandum - Never Despair. That is a motto for you and me. All are not dead; and where there is a spark of patriotic fire, we will rekindle it. "
- Samuel Adams -
We miss you, AC.
We miss you, ToddG.
Somebody left the 1911 platform? -somebody is a tad late to the party!
Not going to lie. I have no problem at all carrying a glock or other striker fired gun pointed at my junk,I do not carry a 1911 cocked and locked and pointed at my junk. With a 1911 hammer cocked and locked, the potential energy stored in the hammer spring gives me enough pause not to point it at my junk.
Bookmarks