They are not each others items. They are the trusts items in which you are both trustees.
They are not each others items. They are the trusts items in which you are both trustees.
Hey guys. I'm new to the forum, and I'm an attorney (but please don't hold that against me). A well drafted gun trust is going to have the sort of provision Jack points out. The provisions relating to the powers of and exoneration of the trustees are prime examples of how a well drafted gun trust differs from a typical (i.e., non-firearms related) living trust: in a gun trust, a trustee is authorized to use the trust property for his own enjoyment; in a non-firearms living trust, the trustee could actually be sued by the beneficiaries for using trust property.
Last edited by RockMaple; 05-03-14 at 08:13.
Not trying to be a nitpicker but in the last line did you mean "sued" rather than "used"? In context here, we are using both words. In a gun trust, the trustee can be allowed to USE trust property, e.g., the NFA items. In a non-gun trust, the trustee might be SUED by beneficiaries if using trust property is a breach of fiduciary duties.
That varies from state to state for example in Florida a trust is liable for all debts of the grantor for 24 months following their death so property in some cases can't be removed from the trust until all debts are settled and debtors have 24 months to file their claim against the estate.
Great info guys. I had a trust drawn up back in March. Was able to efile a Form 1 before the site crashed.
One thing I did not think of before doing this was the possession of NFA items. If I was not home, and my wife has access to the safe, she is technically in possession of those items if not on a trust.
So far I am glad I went the trust route. Had a great guy help me out and answered a ton of questions. He wrote it and saved on a USB drive and CD, so I can change it, add or remove from it whenever I need. As of right now, I am a trustee and grantor, while my wife is also a trustee and beneficiary.
Last edited by mattg1024; 05-04-14 at 06:46.
Having access to the safe is some extreme far reaching 'possession.'
But, using the gun to shoot a burglar is a realistic scenario
Even with the combination, still pretty farfetched
Bookmarks