Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: Bolt Carrier Machining?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    521
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quick update - I received a Brownells M16 bolt carrier (don't know who makes them for Brownells) and turned down a portion of the rear, leaving a shoulder for the buffer spring to seat against. It looks similar to the NEA bolt in the photo without the plastic tip. I decided to try turning it first because that still left the option of chopping if off if I totally FUBAR'd it. While it was pretty hard, a good coated carbide insert handled it. The bigger problem was the slot that runs lengthwise down the bolt. This gave an interrupted cut that busted the tip off my insert twice.

    NEA.jpg

    Taking light cuts (about .010 to .015) I was able to whittle it down and keep the cutter intact with a good surface finish and gave it back to my customer. If I had to do a bunch of them, I'm sure there is a tougher carbide insert that could handle the interrupted cut that would be better suited for the job. All in all, it was a fun challenge.

    I asked my customer to keep me updated on his testing.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,438
    Feedback Score
    12 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Berryhill View Post
    Quick update - I received a Brownells M16 bolt carrier (don't know who makes them for Brownells) and turned down a portion of the rear, leaving a shoulder for the buffer spring to seat against. It looks similar to the NEA bolt in the photo without the plastic tip. I decided to try turning it first because that still left the option of chopping if off if I totally FUBAR'd it. While it was pretty hard, a good coated carbide insert handled it. The bigger problem was the slot that runs lengthwise down the bolt. This gave an interrupted cut that busted the tip off my insert twice.

    NEA.jpg

    Taking light cuts (about .010 to .015) I was able to whittle it down and keep the cutter intact with a good surface finish and gave it back to my customer. If I had to do a bunch of them, I'm sure there is a tougher carbide insert that could handle the interrupted cut that would be better suited for the job. All in all, it was a fun challenge.

    I asked my customer to keep me updated on his testing.
    Did you refinish it? I'd imagine it will rust very quickly.

    Sent from my XT1056 using Tapatalk

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    521
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by MarkG View Post
    Did you refinish it? I'd imagine it will rust very quickly.
    No, it's just a customer's experiment at this point. A little oil will take care of that for now.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    3,704
    Feedback Score
    43 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Berryhill View Post
    No, it's just a customer's experiment at this point. A little oil will take care of that for now.
    Dave, can you expand on this a little? I'm not even sure what the owner is trying to accomplish. Is he trying to replicate a part to work with that stock and receiver extension or is he trying to redesign the carrier / buffer?

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    521
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    He's trying to make a shorty/PDW 300BLK using something like a 4" pistol buffer tube.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    2,177
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    I'm very curious. Is he going to be using a stronger spring being that he is eliminating the buffer assembly and reducing the mass of the carrier? The gas pressure at the port is going to be very high and he will definitely need to account for that [now missing] weight somehow.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    521
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    The project belongs to a customer. I was asked to do the machine work on the bolt carrier and I offered a few suggestions to him but I'm not building the gun.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    20
    Feedback Score
    0
    My concern would be that if something goes kablooey, some bottom feeding attorney is going to be chasing after anyone who had anything to do with this "experiment". I know, I hate all the liability crap too, but sometimes I think it's best to be a spectator. The cons seem to outweigh the pros on this job.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    101
    Feedback Score
    0
    I realize the work has already been completed, but for those that stumble across this in the future:
    Quote Originally Posted by MarkG View Post
    A "mil-spec" carrier is through hardened
    The carrier is typically made from 8620, is heat treated and carburized. There are areas which receive hard chrome, the rest is phosphate after heat treat. The core hardness equates to around RHC 35 if I remember correctly. Tough material, but once you get through the .020" or so of case, it should machine readily.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    521
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Phreakish View Post
    ... Tough material, but once you get through the .020" or so of case, it should machine readily.
    Yes, I would say that my experience with this carrier matched your description. The interrupted cut was a bigger challenge than cutting though the hard, carburized layer.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •