Before you suggest that licensing, background checks, or other restrictions for the 2nd Amendment are reasonable... Apply those same ideas to the 1st and 4th Amendments. Then tell me how reasonable they are.
Funny thing is I always thought I'd have to gamble on a Taurus to get a version with a frame mounted safety. Until this thread I had no idea Beretta ever offered those! It would give me the nostalgia of my military days with the functionality of a modern, practical sidearm.
I hope Beretta reps are reading this thread.
The frame mounted safety is why I prefer CZ, Tanfoglio (Witness), Canik, etc. over the Beretta. If I could buy a Beretta 92 with a frame mounted safety, I'd be all over it in a second. Definitely leave the rail off of mine though.
They will be replacing the internals with factory Beretta SAO internals. Then the frame will be milled for the safeties; they can do strong (any side can be strong) or ambidextrous. I will have to acquire a 92D slide, or I can get one through AGW. This will be an article I am working on, so I'll offer details when I can.
Any updates on the mystery 92? I have been scouring the net for news, hoping it is a new 92G-SD. My credit card is primed for action if that is the case!
It's not a G-SD, but close.
Riots are like sports, it's better to watch it on TV at home.
If its a 92A1 G with a dovetailed front that will be close enough for me, and I will buy one. Thanks for the update!
Bookmarks