Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 28 of 28

Thread: Colt CK901

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Hickville
    Posts
    346
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by C4IGrant View Post
    http://www.janes.com/article/39666/e...ts-ck901-rifle




    Question, would you guys buy this gun?? Cost would be in the $2K range I think.



    C4
    I'd be more interested if the gun was about as expensive as a 6940. Colt guns work fine but if it's getting that close to high dollar then I'd rather wait for the SR47 to finally materialize.
    ˇˇKawaii Desu Ne Haruhi-Chan!!

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    34,086
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Nope, I'm a "cold war" kid and somehow AKs in 5.56 and ARs in 7.62x39 / 5.45x39 are just wrong.

    And if I really need a big, clumsy AR carbine I can also go with a .308.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    819
    Feedback Score
    0
    Grant,

    I would buy it as long as I could set it up to run suppressed well. I wish they could have found a way to design a bolt hold open device though. The advantages of an AR type set up are to numerous to list for a 7.62x39 rifle that uses AK mags, and as far as I'm aware, I won't be able to acquire a Sako M92 or AK-12 anytime soon.

    I'm curious as to how the buffer and spring are set up, and what mods would be needed to run suppressed. A piston version of this rifle would be even more desirable IMHO, in the same manner as the HK416 is set up. I just fear we'll see bolts cracking at less than 3000 rounds on this gun and other durability issues. I guess what I really want then is a SCAR-H modified to take AK mags

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Hickville
    Posts
    346
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by MadAngler1 View Post
    I guess what I really want then is a SCAR-H modified to take AK mags
    Two words, Handl Defense, that company apparently has caliber conversions for 7.62x39 and 5.56/300 BLK for the Scar 17 coming out, though the release date is anyone's guess for the consumer market.
    ˇˇKawaii Desu Ne Haruhi-Chan!!

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    South Louisiana
    Posts
    297
    Feedback Score
    0
    I'd probably buy a .300BLK upper and a reloading setup before I'd buy this gun. It's certainly interesting and a cool historical footnote, but I can't see myself spending that much for a heavy gun with oddball functionality. Of course I only own one 7.62x39 AK, a WASR 10 that I bought mainly for plinking with cheap steel cased ammo.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    439
    Feedback Score
    11 (100%)
    I want one, just not sure if I want it for $2k. I do have a plan to get a rifle in 7.62x39 that is not an AK and uses AK mags. But, it's not about collect-ability for me at all, it's just about having fun shooting...so that price tag would be hard to justify.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    2,162
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by SteyrAUG View Post
    Nope, I'm a "cold war" kid and somehow AKs in 5.56 and ARs in 7.62x39 / 5.45x39 are just wrong.

    And if I really need a big, clumsy AR carbine I can also go with a .308.
    Hear hear!
    It's just bad juju. The gods disapprove.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    278
    Feedback Score
    11 (100%)
    I'd also be interested, but not at that price or the heavy barrel.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •