Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 80

Thread: When To Choose A .308 Over 5.56?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    710
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by bzdog View Post
    The reason NV brought up .308 is a number of 300 BLK ammunition is made with bullets designed for .308.
    Got it, thanks, John. I wasn't aware of that. I obviously need to educate myself a little more before getting into 300 BLK.

    Dave

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Phoenix, Az
    Posts
    4,381
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by bzdog View Post
    While I don't disagree, why .308 over 300 Win Mag or such?

    -john
    I like 308 for its general ubiquity. Though for a dedicated precision rifle I do believe that there are many better offerings than the 308.

    Plus the original post was about the 308.
    C co 1/30th Infantry Regiment
    3rd Brigade 3rd Infantry Division
    2002-2006
    OIF 1 and 3

    IraqGunz:
    No dude is going to get shot in the chest at 300 yards and look down and say "What is that, a 3 MOA group?"

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    seattle(ish)
    Posts
    585
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Gotcha.

    -john

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Vegas
    Posts
    6,717
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Failure2Stop View Post
    Because a contemporary lightweight 7.62 (SCAR-H, M110K1, M110K2 types) can be shot as fast, and are as maneuverable as heavier 5.56.
    I pretty frequently win 2-gun competitions while shooting a 7.62 with 20 round mags (recently 25s) against 5.56 competition rigs. I most definately spent a lot of cake to get that kind of performance though.
    308 is just easier to get to high terminal performance, and if I can get it in a format that I can shoot fast and with precision, well, that's "the one".
    What is your 308 2 gun rifle set up as? SR-25 ACC with Mk8 H27, MAMS, and 45° folding irons?
    "I never learned from a man who agreed with me." Robert A. Heinlein

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    9,328
    Feedback Score
    28 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Koshinn View Post
    What is your 308 2 gun rifle set up as? SR-25 ACC with Mk8 H27, MAMS, and 45° folding irons?
    Yup.
    Jack Leuba
    Director of Sales
    Knight's Armament Company
    jleuba@knightarmco.com

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    92
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thank you all for your posts.
    C-grunt,sir,I'd like hear your thougts please,on better offerings than the .308?
    Failure2Stop,sir,on the post that your beating guys with 5.56 in two gun matches,do you think your a better shot than them or do you think it's the .308 platform your using?

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    9,328
    Feedback Score
    28 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by RONK View Post
    Thank you all for your posts.
    C-grunt,sir,I'd like hear your thougts please,on better offerings than the .308?
    Failure2Stop,sir,on the post that your beating guys with 5.56 in two gun matches,do you think your a better shot than them or do you think it's the .308 platform your using?
    Apologies, didn't mean my comment to read as a humblebrag.
    I'm a good Indian with a good bow and a quiver of good arrows.

    My point was not so much about the gun being better than anything else, rather that the performance difference as far as maneuverability is concerned is less than many believe.
    Jack Leuba
    Director of Sales
    Knight's Armament Company
    jleuba@knightarmco.com

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    92
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Failure2Stop View Post
    Apologies, didn't mean my comment to read as a humblebrag.
    I'm a good Indian with a good bow and a quiver of good arrows.

    My point was not so much about the gun being better than anything else, rather that the performance difference as far as maneuverability is concerned is less than many believe.
    Sir,no apologies needed,I did not take your post as a brag at all,I thought you weren't giving yourself enough credit for being a better shooter that the guys with the 5.56.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    449
    Feedback Score
    25 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Failure2Stop View Post
    Yup.
    Jack: did you sand your URX 4 rail covers? They certainly appear to be KAC but have a different texture.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Western US
    Posts
    2,474
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Personally broke it down for my own rifles/uses as:

    0-200 yards - 5.56/.223 general purpose

    0-400 yards - 6.8 SPC hunting, general purpose

    100-600 yards - .308/7.62 longer range shooting, hunting

    I have a great fondness for all three calibers (still new to the 6.8 as well), and am in no way trying to imply that these are their only ranges and/or capabilities, just my own personal views and setups for them and their uses for me alone.

Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •