Page 1 of 10 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 100

Thread: BattleComp 51.0

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    2,692
    Feedback Score
    40 (100%)

    BattleComp 51.0

    This is interesting - Introducing the long-awaited BC51.0! http://battlecomp.com/index.php?main...products_id=72

    I know they did these (battlecomp welded onto a AAC 51 tooth mount) for a while in the custom shop but I thought the idea died off. It would be interesting on an SBR, pricy though!

    IMG_0686.JPG

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    276
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Having owned both a BattleComp 2.0 & 1.5 pinned to a 14.5" barrel, I can honestly say "pass".

    There are better, more-effective muzzle devices, for less money.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Auburn AL
    Posts
    1,796
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    I love my BattleComp wish it came with other options other than AAC 51 tooth. Got a Specwar on the way and would love to see that option.
    Last edited by lunchbox; 10-16-14 at 21:20.
    ^^ Read with southern accent !^^ and blame all grammatical errors on Alabama's public school system.
    Technique is nothing more than failed style. Cecil B DeMented
    "If you can't eat it or hump it, piss on it and walk away."-Dog
    Go where the food is.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    2,692
    Feedback Score
    40 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by ^Rb View Post
    Having owned both a BattleComp 2.0 & 1.5 pinned to a 14.5" barrel, I can honestly say "pass".

    There are better, more-effective muzzle devices, for less money.
    I agree but if you use AAC suppressors you are stuck with their three options. This may be great for a rifle that rarely wears a can but you would like to have the option to throw it on.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    1,760
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    I'd be concerned about the lifespan of this.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    2,692
    Feedback Score
    40 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by RyanB View Post
    I'd be concerned about the lifespan of this.
    What makes you say that?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    1,760
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Once you put the can on, you have a LOT of heat and pressure in that little tube and it's going to erode a lot.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    454
    Feedback Score
    0
    This was my concern as well. I don't know that the original design was intended for this level of use. It may not take the beating that the guts of a can delivers. Doesn't hurt to try it out though. That's especially true if someone else tries.

    Quote Originally Posted by RyanB View Post
    I'd be concerned about the lifespan of this.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    12,145
    Feedback Score
    43 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by themonk View Post
    I agree but if you use AAC suppressors you are stuck with their three options. This may be great for a rifle that rarely wears a can but you would like to have the option to throw it on.
    Exactly.

    It's easy to say "pass" when you're not running a can on a 10.3" barrel and either eroding your suppressor with a flash hider or rattling your teeth with the brake.

    This is big, and I'll be purchasing one. The idea of pressure in the compensator while suppressed does concern me a bit, however.
    Why do the loudest do the least?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    12,145
    Feedback Score
    43 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by ^Rb View Post
    Having owned both a BattleComp 2.0 & 1.5 pinned to a 14.5" barrel, I can honestly say "pass".

    There are better, more-effective muzzle devices, for less money.
    Really? That mount to an AAC 51t suppressor? Where???
    Why do the loudest do the least?

Page 1 of 10 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •