We're worried about a dust cover? Seriously?
We're worried about a dust cover? Seriously?
The number of folks on my Full Of Shit list grows everyday
I am American
If I had titled the thread "Ejection port covers are useless and you're a f'ing moron if you disagree" then these responses would be relevant. I didn't write that though so wtf? I said it was a plus that this receiver doesn't have a dust cover because I'm doing a 458 build and the dust cover spring has a tendency to snag brass as its ejecting. Go hijack another thread, not really in the mood for trollers.
You guys gotta stop that stuff, I almost drowned in soda. We need a header: CAUTION, YOU'RE ABOUT TO READ SOMETHING THAT MAY CAUSE YOU TO CHOKE, DROWN, URINATE, OR DEFECATE. PLEASE REFRAIN FROM EATING OR DRINKING AND USE OF THE FACILITIES BEFORE READING IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED!
Last edited by mastiffhound; 10-21-14 at 14:35.
Appeasement is never the answer in the face of naked aggression.
I never got the appeal of side chargers. Less (especially moving) parts outside the AR the better IMO. Shame that the lack of a dust cover being a benefit due to the upper's intended use with .458 Socom was not mentioned earlier, probably could have saved a bit of bother.
went to their site and facebook page, seen they had 12 people who gave them 5 stars so i clicked on where they were all from and miraculously they are all from arizona. and the company is from arizona. basically they are a no name company having people that work for them give them all kinds of positive feedback on the net which is the kind of dishonest advertising i hate. do you think they go through the stingy qc techniques like all the other top of the line guys go through? maybe, i guess we will never know if people don't try them out and give us an honest review but i'm not going to be the test dummy.
What's wrong with Independence ammo?
Bookmarks