Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 37

Thread: How many signatures required on trust?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Bora Bora
    Posts
    6,086
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    My, attorney prepared, NFA trust has two witness signatures on the page where the trustee and co-trustee signatures are notarized. There are no witness signatures associated with any of the successor trustees only Notarized signatures required.

    As stated below, this will vary from State to State.
    Last edited by HKGuns; 11-14-14 at 14:35.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Huntsville, AL
    Posts
    2,185
    Feedback Score
    26 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by skydivr View Post
    Find an attorney and make sure it's done RIGHT...
    Ding ding ding we have a winner. The consequence of getting it wrong is go directly to jail, do not pass go, do not collect $200. It's worth paying a lawyer a few hundred to get it right.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    4,383
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    "How many signatures required on trust?"

    It depends on state law.

    VA required the Grantor only (notarized).

    FL required the Grantor and two witnesses (all notarized).

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    41
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by nova3930 View Post
    Ding ding ding we have a winner. The consequence of getting it wrong is go directly to jail, do not pass go, do not collect $200. It's worth paying a lawyer a few hundred to get it right.
    Here is my thing about attorneys FWIW: I know several, and have dealt with a lot more. I'm a cop and have dealt with prosecutors, defense, as well as civil attorneys. Nothing wrong with any of them, I don't have an anti-attorney bias. But the fact of the matter is they are only people. When they graduate from law school, or pass the BAR exam, they are not given the keys to the kingdom, they are not issued any set of books or anything with any secret knowledge that is unavailable to regular people.

    To say that only an attorney can do a trust, or they can only do it right, is exactly the same as saying 'only cops should have guns'. (insert "I am the only one here professional enough....." video clip here)

    Not bragging, but I've met a lot of attorneys who are not as smart as me.

    What an attorney is needed for is to make all the trips to the courthouse, to represent you when you aren't there, and to prepare the paperwork that you either don't have time, or ability to prepare. That doesn't mean that the rest of us don't have the ability.

    Off the soap box

    I went to the Texas statues to look. I see no requirement for having witness signatures. In fact, according to my research, in Texas a Trust doesn't even have to be in writing. But since we are dealing with the BATFIEO, I wonder if there is any requirement from them.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Huntsville, AL
    Posts
    2,185
    Feedback Score
    26 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by mr fixit View Post
    Here is my thing about attorneys FWIW: I know several, and have dealt with a lot more. I'm a cop and have dealt with prosecutors, defense, as well as civil attorneys. Nothing wrong with any of them, I don't have an anti-attorney bias. But the fact of the matter is they are only people. When they graduate from law school, or pass the BAR exam, they are not given the keys to the kingdom, they are not issued any set of books or anything with any secret knowledge that is unavailable to regular people.

    To say that only an attorney can do a trust, or they can only do it right, is exactly the same as saying 'only cops should have guns'. (insert "I am the only one here professional enough....." video clip here)

    Not bragging, but I've met a lot of attorneys who are not as smart as me.

    What an attorney is needed for is to make all the trips to the courthouse, to represent you when you aren't there, and to prepare the paperwork that you either don't have time, or ability to prepare. That doesn't mean that the rest of us don't have the ability.
    I'm not implying that attorneys are the only people that can do it. My point is that someone with the relevent educational background and experience has a higher probability of getting it right than someone just doing it one time based on what they're reading in a book.

    Relating the "only one's" argument to my profession of aero engineer, you can go to your local public library and find all the information you need to design and build an airplane from the ground up and it's possible for anyone willing to put the time and effort into it to build an airplane that will safely take you aloft. That being said, the probability of ending up in a smoking crater is a lot higher with "joe sixpack" and his library airplane than if you get guys like me with some education and experience to do it.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Texas (and sometimes Central Virginia)
    Posts
    113
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by mr fixit View Post
    Here is my thing about attorneys FWIW: I know several, and have dealt with a lot more. I'm a cop and have dealt with prosecutors, defense, as well as civil attorneys. Nothing wrong with any of them, I don't have an anti-attorney bias. But the fact of the matter is they are only people. When they graduate from law school, or pass the BAR exam, they are not given the keys to the kingdom, they are not issued any set of books or anything with any secret knowledge that is unavailable to regular people.

    ...

    Not bragging, but I've met a lot of attorneys who are not as smart as me.
    I didn't have an attorney do it because he's smarter than me. I had an attorney do it because he's a hell of lot more experienced than me. He's spent over a decade writing and litigating trusts, and he has legal responsibility to represent me competently.

    The thing is, everyone has a different risk tolerance. I'll write my own contracts when there's a few thousand bucks on the line, but when I'm dealing with the government, and especially the ATF, its worth the $200 to me to mitigate the risk that I screw something up. If you are confident enough in your abilities that it's not a risk to you, that's awesome, and most likely you won't ever have any problems.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    41
    Feedback Score
    0
    I did not mean to insult anyone, attorneys or anyone who used an attorney to do a trust. I simply dislike hearing that it is the only way to do it correctly.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    38
    Feedback Score
    0
    I'm from Texas and also have two witnesses for the signatures. The way that my attorney wrote the signature page might help make your problem a lot more convenient. Each signature has an associated notary spot and witness spot so that once I signed my spot and had it notarized, I passed it on to the next trustee and they could go at their convenance(without me) to sign their part and have it notarized. Then pass it on to the next trustee.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    657
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by mr fixit View Post
    Here is my thing about attorneys FWIW: I know several, and have dealt with a lot more. I'm a cop and have dealt with prosecutors, defense, as well as civil attorneys. Nothing wrong with any of them, I don't have an anti-attorney bias. But the fact of the matter is they are only people. When they graduate from law school, or pass the BAR exam, they are not given the keys to the kingdom, they are not issued any set of books or anything with any secret knowledge that is unavailable to regular people.

    To say that only an attorney can do a trust, or they can only do it right, is exactly the same as saying 'only cops should have guns'. (insert "I am the only one here professional enough....." video clip here)

    Not bragging, but I've met a lot of attorneys who are not as smart as me.

    What an attorney is needed for is to make all the trips to the courthouse, to represent you when you aren't there, and to prepare the paperwork that you either don't have time, or ability to prepare. That doesn't mean that the rest of us don't have the ability.

    Off the soap box

    I went to the Texas statues to look. I see no requirement for having witness signatures. In fact, according to my research, in Texas a Trust doesn't even have to be in writing. But since we are dealing with the BATFIEO, I wonder if there is any requirement from them.
    Quote Originally Posted by mr fixit View Post
    Just wondering, I have a copy of a trust that I am using for a template to do my own. Of course it has a place for signatures of the notary, and the settler and any other named trustees. But, it also has a place to list 2 'witnesses' . I'm just wondering why. Is that something I must have, or was it just something 'thrown in'?

    Does anybody else have those type signatures on their trusts?
    STOP, HIRE an ATTORNEY

    Quote Originally Posted by mr fixit View Post
    Here is my thing about attorneys FWIW: I know several, and have dealt with a lot more. I'm a cop and have dealt with prosecutors, defense, as well as civil attorneys. Nothing wrong with any of them, I don't have an anti-attorney bias. But the fact of the matter is they are only people. When they graduate from law school, or pass the BAR exam, they are not given the keys to the kingdom, they are not issued any set of books or anything with any secret knowledge that is unavailable to regular people.

    To say that only an attorney can do a trust, or they can only do it right, is exactly the same as saying 'only cops should have guns'. (insert "I am the only one here professional enough....." video clip here)

    Not bragging, but I've met a lot of attorneys who are not as smart as me.

    What an attorney is needed for is to make all the trips to the courthouse, to represent you when you aren't there, and to prepare the paperwork that you either don't have time, or ability to prepare. That doesn't mean that the rest of us don't have the ability.

    Off the soap box

    I went to the Texas statues to look. I see no requirement for having witness signatures. In fact, according to my research, in Texas a Trust doesn't even have to be in writing. But since we are dealing with the BATFIEO, I wonder if there is any requirement from them.

    Oh wait, sounds like you are smarter than all of them, yet stupid enough to use a boilerplate trust without making the necessary adjustments to ensure proper satisfaction of the Texas code, most of which cannot be gleaned by a cursory reading of the statute. Additionally, you are asking EXTREMELY basic questions which means you definitely do not understand what needs to be done to boilerplate trust to actually make it workable, valid, and enforceable. And I'm absolutely positive you understand how to adjust the trust depending on the circumstances surrounding your potential beneficiaries as well. I have spent so much time undoing the damage that people, JUST LIKE YOU, have done just because they think they are so damn smart. You are dealing with things that can cost you thousands of dollars and possible federal prison time, not just for you, but for any of your beneficiaries as well. But its ok, you would rather be arrogant than talk to someone who understands probate law, does it for a living, and probably only charges $300-500 to ensure your property that will be worth well over $1000 is properly taken care of.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    94
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by RHINOWSO View Post
    "How many signatures required on trust?"

    It depends on state law.
    yes it does

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •