I saw that this was on sale on PSA's website. Is it any good?
http://palmettostatearmory.com/index...bine-rail.html
I saw that this was on sale on PSA's website. Is it any good?
http://palmettostatearmory.com/index...bine-rail.html
Agree junk, spend $100 on the equipment exchange and get a used KAC RAS that is a known performer.
'Evil Minds That Plot Destruction'
RUN!
Shop around and you can probably get a RAS for under a hundred. Hell, saw a DD Omega today used for $150 and that is a freefloat rail.
"I don't collect guns anymore, I stockpile weapons for ****ing war." Chuck P.
"Some days you eat the bacon, and other days the bacon eats you." SeriousStudent
"Don't complain when after killing scores of women and children in a mall, a group of well armed men who train to shoot people like you in the face show up to say hello." WillBrink
I would veer away from that rail. Like others say, I would surf the EE for a used KAC RAS.
I have a Daniel Defense Omega X carbine rail I'm looking to get rid of. Came on my bcm upper but I switched it out. Perfect condition. Pm me if you're interested.
Don't mess with that PSA rail. KAC RAS is obviously the standard for drop in quad rails, but another option is the Midwest industries gen 2 drop in quad rail. Its a quality rail for a reasonable price point (125.00 new). It locks up extremely tight (seats up into the milspec barrel nut) and is lighter than the KAC rail (MI carbine length rail is virtually the same weight as plastic handguards). It doesn't have the heat shields like the KAC rail, but that's never been a problem for me. use rail covers etc. Cosmetically, the MI rail looks quite similar to the KAC rail, which I like. If im looking for a drop in carbine length quad rail, I wouldn't consider anything else. Just my personal opinion, obviously.
If you're on a budget, the KAC/P&S is your best bet. If u you got a little more to spend, the Daniel Defense Omega is nicer and thinner. I'll have a used one for sale soon too.
Sometimes you guys make me chuckle, the "junk" description may be correct but I'll bet none of the respondents have seen one prior to their judgement, I know I have not.
Bookmarks