Page 3 of 20 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 196

Thread: ALG officially announces 6-second mount for Glock pistols

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    central Texas
    Posts
    1,947
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    I'm reminded of saddle mounts once offered by Redfield and others used to mount scopes on 870 and 1100 shotguns. The two trigger pin holes through the frame accepted the mount's threaded cross pins, which then could be tightened by turning a nut. Too much torque on the nut flexed the receiver and hindered function.
    For me this system never worked. I understand that the APL design differs.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,166
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by El Cid View Post
    Thanks for the information Steve! Are you running it with a light? If so, how does the lower position affect operation of the light?
    I have larger hands it doesn't really effect me the way i use the light
    STEVE FISHER
    INSTRUCTOR
    Sentinel Concepts

    Consultant for
    Trijicon
    midwest industries
    Nighthawk custom firearms

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,920
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve View Post
    I have larger hands it doesn't really effect me the way i use the light
    Thank you! I'm thinking that the support hand during two hand shooting looks workable. I'm concerned about one hand manipulation though. Currently I can activate my X300 with my trigger finger pretty easily when shooting with one hand. The photos make it look like it may require a shift in grip to do that with the 6SM.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NW Montana
    Posts
    39
    Feedback Score
    0
    Any reason, aside from the obvious OAL difference, that this won't drop onto a 19? All the other dimensions on the 17/19 are the same correct?

    I imagine a compact frame mount would be the next logical step for a v2, if that's the only modification needed to the design.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    387
    Feedback Score
    18 (95%)
    Quote Originally Posted by CMW View Post
    Any reason, aside from the obvious OAL difference, that this won't drop onto a 19? All the other dimensions on the 17/19 are the same correct?

    I imagine a compact frame mount would be the next logical step for a v2, if that's the only modification needed to the design.
    Not seeing the point in putting something this big and bulky on the smaller gun?

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,166
    Feedback Score
    0
    sight radius is non issue with redot its really not that bulky
    STEVE FISHER
    INSTRUCTOR
    Sentinel Concepts

    Consultant for
    Trijicon
    midwest industries
    Nighthawk custom firearms

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,166
    Feedback Score
    0
    FullSizeRender.jpg
    Attached Images Attached Images
    STEVE FISHER
    INSTRUCTOR
    Sentinel Concepts

    Consultant for
    Trijicon
    midwest industries
    Nighthawk custom firearms

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NW Montana
    Posts
    39
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Up1911fan View Post
    Not seeing the point in putting something this big and bulky on the smaller gun?
    Why not? I know plenty of people that simply prefer the 19 over the 17, regardless of application.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    3,839
    Feedback Score
    10 (100%)
    I sort of want to get this for my 17L.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    155
    Feedback Score
    0
    Not really a fan of this.

Page 3 of 20 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •