got a uciw to compare it to? or does anyone know how much shorter this is than the collapsed uciw?
got a uciw to compare it to? or does anyone know how much shorter this is than the collapsed uciw?
That looks like the stock B.A.D. sells also.
Edit: BAD is monolithic to lower...
Last edited by Campbell; 11-29-15 at 09:52.
"I would rather be the hammer than the anvil."- Rommel
Owner: Hangar 18 Custom Coatings
They are going to be selling a bolt on kit. So far they're saying it's not 9mm compatible. They may address that before production. But man, does it look great. It's on their site for pre order right now.
I'm curious about their buffer setup though. From the scant pictures i've seen, it looks like a miniature buffer (ala UCIW) but with built in rubber shock absorbers half way down the body.
Decided to give it a shot. Haven't shot it yet. Already replaced the QDC mount with a Trifecta 7.62. Will run it suppressed when my Saker clears.
"People have always been stupid. The Internet just makes it easier for us to know about them." - donlapalma
^^^^Very Nice-
"I would rather be the hammer than the anvil."- Rommel
Owner: Hangar 18 Custom Coatings
Is the right side pic with the stock collapsed completely collapsed? Curious if it interferes with the right side bolt release.
From Tapatalk:
Jack Leuba
Knight's Armament Company: Military/Govt Product Liaison
F2S Consulting: Director of Shooting Stuff
I like the idea of this design, most especially since I could use my existing BCG.
ETC (SW/AW), USN (1998-2008)
CVN-65, USS Enterprise
Slick set-up. I have one on order and that's exactly what I was planning to do with it.
Please update progress once you put some rounds down range. Pros/cons.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited by Ap0c69; 12-01-15 at 21:59.
Bookmarks