Originally Posted by
hotrodder636
That makes sense, my math skills are dwindling.
What about the durability question? Are you permitted to answer/comment?
Originally Posted by
Kudu22
We have shot a few of the pre-production ones for 5k in a day with zero issues on wear. It was done using a Glock 17 and running 10 17 round mags. burn thru the mags and reload. We did notice the piston will slow down after about 400 rounds and would need to be cleaned more frequantly compared to the baffle stack. We finished a MP5 mount so we are going to do a full auto destructive test. As far as a pistol goes we have not had issues or wear.
Edit to add: maybe I missed the conversation?
? Why the testing of a rifle can with pistol rounds? I would be more impressed with 5,000 5.56 or 7.62 rounds then 9mm. I'm assuming your commenting about SF's new 9mm can, in which case what does that have to do with the SF 300?
Kudu, I have a SOCOM762-RC and SOCOM556-RC. I plan on buying a 300 SPS specifically for my 300blk SBR. Can you comment on the baffle stack material in comparison to the RC line (full inconel vs. just the blast baffle etc? )
Thanks again Kudu, we appreciate all the replies.
Last edited by domestique; 08-30-15 at 13:27.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." Thomas Jefferson.
Bookmarks