Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: 5.56mm sound tests, July 2008.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,705
    Feedback Score
    0

    5.56mm sound tests, July 2008.

    Mic one meter to the left of the muzzle, A-weighted.




    M4 14.5" with XM193, 169.0 dB

    M4-2000, 134.4 dB, 4.1 dB FRP, 34.6 NSR, 16.9 oz, $895

    AAC SPR/M4-K, 138.3 dB, 0 FRP, 30.7 NSR, 16.9 oz, $1050
    (not our SPR/M4 but a special short version).

    Surefire FA556K, 137.6 dB, 5.7 dB FRP, 31.4 NSR, 16.0 oz, $1265

    Surefire OTB, 138.4 dB, 5.0 dB FRP, 30.6 NSR, 17.3 oz, $1265

    M4-1000, 139.3 dB, 2.5 dB FRP, 29.7 NSR, 16.7 oz, $595



    H&K 416 10" with M855, 166.0 dB


    M4-2000, 130.7 dB, +4.5 FRP, -35.3dB NSR, 16.9 oz, $895

    FA556K, 138.3 dB, +4.7 FRP, -27.7 NSR, 16.0 oz, $1265

    Ranger2, 139.9 dB, 0.0 dB FRP, -26.1 NSR, $475

    SRT Typhoon/Atlas, 144.0 dB, +1.2 dB FRP, -22.0 NSR, 24.3 oz, $745
























  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    261
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Nice post.

    I'm sure this thread will generate a good bit of feedback.

    Thanks

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nashville, TN.
    Posts
    329
    Feedback Score
    0
    Looks about an average of 35db reduction using a silencer.

    I know that db's reductions are not linear, but I've read somewhere that just a 10 db increase in sound level corresponds approximately to a perceived doubling of loudness, is this true?
    Old age and treachery always overcome youth and skill

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    1,044
    Feedback Score
    0
    You get to have too much fun!

    Question - could you show a picture of the SPR/M4-k next to the standard SPR/M4? I would have also liked to have seen the numbers for the standard SPR/M4.

    Spooky

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,705
    Feedback Score
    0
    We have tested the normal SPR/M4 a lot. It is over 36 dB on an M4. There is about a 3/4 difference in length.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    100
    Feedback Score
    0
    Excellent post. You have helped me make up my mind on which to go with.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    911
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    I'm surprised that the 14.5" was louder than the 10" unsurppressed. I'm also surprised that the Ranger2 fell about 4 decibles below advertised performance. Website also states 95% reduction, this test showed about 85%. The Typhoon also fell about 4 decibles short of advertised reduction.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    82
    Feedback Score
    0
    The Ranger was originally designed for 14.5" barrels. That silencer is also a little more ammo dependent. XM193 is worst case.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,265
    Feedback Score
    0
    I had seen posted by NickB that the M4-1000, althought having a low price point, was not an can low on preformance. This is a great post. Thanks.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    903
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Great info.

    Can you share point of impact shift and group size variance between the various models tested?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •