SIG MCX: When is an AR not an AR?

**Slippers** · 06-28-17, 12:23

Originally Posted by mig1nc

Son of a gun. I just ordered a 300 series IR and forgot the code.

PS I'm the guy up the road.

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

Email me and I'll get the discount taken care of for you.

**Defaultmp3** · 06-30-17, 22:37

Hrm, wonder what real changes there are.

**Tokarev** · 07-01-17, 02:41

I like the new forend. It is a good idea to open the rail up around the gas adjustments.

Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk

**mark5pt56** · 07-01-17, 05:36

I heard they were coming out with some new MCX models. I still want the CSASS submission and it would be cool if they would make a 5.56 version of it.

**Beat Trash** · 07-01-17, 12:42

I have a birthday in December. If by then there is no issues with this new MCX, then I'm buying one.

**Joe R.** · 07-01-17, 17:57

I'd be curious if they addressed the inconsistent accuracy issues.

**ABNAK** · 07-01-17, 21:06

Can't migrate to a thinner handguard, eh?

**call_me_ski** · 07-03-17, 13:40

Originally Posted by Tokarev

I like the new forend. It is a good idea to open the rail up around the gas adjustments.

Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk

I wonder if this was driven by the USSOCOM PDW requirement. The top rail would have potentially been longer than the barrel on the legacy MCX to meet OAL requirements.