Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 34

Thread: Accuracy Evaluation of a Noveske 16” N4 Light Barrel

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,413
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Another great post!

    Thank you very much for taking the time to do these tests and especially post them here.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Republic of Texas
    Posts
    4,088
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Great test and post! Thank you for sharing the info and test results!

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    91
    Feedback Score
    0
    As always, great review.

    Any plans for Ranier Arms examples?

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    249
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Glockman1968 View Post
    Wow! Almost one big hole. That 80 shot overlay is incredible.
    Here's a 200-round "group" from a similar barrel haha!


  5. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    32
    Feedback Score
    0
    Outstanding.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Fromunda
    Posts
    500
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Awesome write up and review! I continue to be amazed how accurate Noveske Barrels are with the right loads. It would be interesting to see what this set up would achieve using a more real world application, not in a fixed vice on concrete. I have seen first hand Noveske AR's shoot sub MOA with nothing more than a range bag used for a rest, and crappy ammo.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    401
    Feedback Score
    0
    When you take away other variables by using a fixed vice on concrete, you're looking more at the barrel than the shooter. It shows what the barrel is capable of. Most shooters can't approach that in most conditions.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Fromunda
    Posts
    500
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Junkie View Post
    When you take away other variables by using a fixed vice on concrete, you're looking more at the barrel than the shooter. It shows what the barrel is capable of. Most shooters can't approach that in most conditions.
    Very good point, and I am aware of taking out said variables and making it a zero sum profile. But I would contend that knowing what a rifle is capable of in a real world scenario is just as important and indicative of how a rifle/barrel performs.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    401
    Feedback Score
    0
    Firing unsupported, I doubt I'd notice the difference between a 0.5MOA setup and a 1.0MOA setup... I'm just not very good at it. I imagine Molon is likely better at it than me, though.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    417
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    These barrels are made by FN - correct?


    TIA

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •