Page 2 of 13 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 127

Thread: Thinking About a PTR-91

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Marietta Georgia
    Posts
    593
    Feedback Score
    17 (100%)
    I used to have one. Not a bad rifle. I ditched it to go the m14 route. With the grip frames you need to switch out the selector as well iirc. If you like the platform then go for it. They are serviceable but not to same quality as hk or a quality parts kit build.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Somehwere in 14T NT
    Posts
    56
    Feedback Score
    0
    I got one of the PTR91 rifles that CDNN had on sale back in December. It came with the cheapest scope mount and mystery scope but it did come with 10 spare mags and for a pretty decent price at $800. However, I did make a few upgrades by adding a wide handguard for better hand protection from a hot barrel and trunion, an HK21 cocking handle for easier cocking since the wide handguard does make it a little harder to get at the cocking handle. I also went with the heavy buffer to cut back on the snappy recoil of a roller lock design. Of course, I had to replace the cocking tube cap with a bayonet lug just to piss off liberals and for those drive-by bayoneting opportunities that may present itself.




    This right here though is the 2 biggest modifications I made to greatly improve the ergonomics. First, the selector lever is too short and too far forward to manipulate without shifting my grip. I don't have the thumb of an orangutan so an extended lever from RTG made a big improvement here. Also, the M-16 style magazine release is just one step above worthless. Again, WAY too far forward to manipulate easily. I could have gone with the tac latch but I wanted to get that correct G3 feel to it so sent it off to Bill Springfield to have an anti-rattle paddle magazine release installed. I also got a pinned and clipped metal trigger housing just to add to the G3 look. Totally cosmetic here but looks a lot better. If nothing else, the selector lever and magazine release are the two "must have" mods that are truly needed on this rifle.


  3. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,221
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    There are some threads on here and definitely on the HkCentric forum if search here doesn't work that walk down the whole JLD/PTR timeline and address what serial numbers are what with known issues. Some A-prefix guns had tight chambers, but most work fine. Very early AW guns are fine, but the switch to TC barrels with shallow flutes around AW1500-200 or so caused issues with any tar-sealed ammo, which includes South African, Radway, Paki, DAG, and a bunch of others, including US made M852 and special ball. After blaming the issue on underpowered ammo for years, they went back to correct flute geometry with the GI model and across the line shortly after. All current barrels are GTG. As German parts dried up and domestic manufacture had to pick up the slack, there were some initial hardness issues with both bolts and trunnions. PTR replaced all cracked bolts or trunnions and eventually sorted out the metallurgy. There was a pretty good write up on one of the more manufacturing and engineering centric forums about cross sectioned hardness of PTR, RCM, and HK components, and it seemed the latest stuff is quite good. Anything after AW8376 or so and any new GIs should be fine.

    From a practical side, I have 5 PTRs. 2 that had shallow flutes. One wears an RCM k barrel now, the other is a DMR and kept the TC barrel since it's a sub MOA roller locker and I didn't have the heart to change the bbl. out. One GI, which cracked the trunnion as one of the hardness problem guns, PTR fixed that in a week turn, and it's been fine since. 2 are late production guns, Post AW8376 or so for an MSG91 in battle rifle trim and a 16" GI with a full length cocking tube. I recently acquired the second GI and don't have time on it, but the MSG91 has been trouble free.

    If they don't have welded rails, they have MFI mounts bedded, but not glued, to the receivers with steel bed. All except the DMR with shallow flutes shoot all ammo just fine, including tar sealed and steel cased. The DMR runs suppressed most of the time with a #17 locking piece and a single stage heavy buffer. All have real paddle releases added. Just bite the bullet and get it done, it's the way the rifle was intended to be run. The heavy buffers from Ghilliebear are GTG...he makes them by welding two stock buffer bodies together, turning a new piston and adding a new spring pack. They are also a lot cheaper than real heavy buffers and easier to fit in most stocks. The ESSL type SEF levers are useful...I have no problem with the selector unless I'm prone, but then the extended helps. YMMV.

    While they are cheap, pick up extractors, extractor springs (You'll likely ruin one or two of these detail cleaning over the years), ejectors, firing pin and spring, and a recoil spring or two. If you are going to mess with the trigger at all, pick up an extra hammer and sear. Then...Rollers... +2, +4, +8 are in my stash, along with retainer plates and pins. I have a ton of stuff, but it's because I'm a roller gun nerd, not because I really need it.

    I got into these years ago, when commercially available 7.62 AR variants were dubious, at best. I like roller guns, but if I were starting over, I'd probably have a couple to play with and be more heavy on SCAR or AR variants in 7.62. My G3k clone, though, is one of my favorites, and just a fun gun that is rather effective.

    Mags aren't 99 cents anymore like when I bought most of mine, but they are still so cheap that it just doesn't make sense for us to bother making one. The gun is pretty forgiving as far as feeding, and I can't say I've ever had a failure to feed, even from really messed up mags. It's a big gaping hole to hit and an enormous bolt carrier slamming the rounds home, so it works. The BCG would likely also make a highly effective melee weapon. :-)
    Duane Liptak, Jr.
    Executive Vice President
    Magpul Industries

    info@magpulcore.com

    This is a personal account linked to a personal e-mail. Company affiliation and titles are provided purely for transparency requirements of the host site. Although factual company information may be shared through this account, any opinions expressed are solely those of the account holder, and not necessarily those of Magpul Industries or subsidiaries.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    IN
    Posts
    546
    Feedback Score
    25 (100%)
    My A prefix was a decent shooter and only choked a handful of times. It shot South African, Santa Barbara(Spanish), and Port just fine. Just for grins one day I decided to shoot the remainder of Cavim I had around. It finally choked on the 17th round, but what gun wouldn't. My 91KF(16") AW serial gun would choke on just about any 7.62 surplus NATO ammo plus the bolt appeared to be very soft. The newer ones have intrigued me though and it would be nice to maybe add another 7.62x51 gun to the stable. I enjoyed shooting the platform and the recoil wasn't bad at all. The gun I really miss is my Springfield SAR8(NO, not the crappy aluminum one )

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    southern US
    Posts
    1,519
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SPQR476 View Post
    There are some threads on here and definitely on the HkCentric forum if search here doesn't work that walk down the whole JLD/PTR timeline and address what serial numbers are what with known issues. Some A-prefix guns had tight chambers, but most work fine. Very early AW guns are fine, but the switch to TC barrels with shallow flutes around AW1500-200 or so caused issues with any tar-sealed ammo, which includes South African, Radway, Paki, DAG, and a bunch of others, including US made M852 and special ball. After blaming the issue on underpowered ammo for years, they went back to correct flute geometry with the GI model and across the line shortly after. All current barrels are GTG. As German parts dried up and domestic manufacture had to pick up the slack, there were some initial hardness issues with both bolts and trunnions. PTR replaced all cracked bolts or trunnions and eventually sorted out the metallurgy. There was a pretty good write up on one of the more manufacturing and engineering centric forums about cross sectioned hardness of PTR, RCM, and HK components, and it seemed the latest stuff is quite good. Anything after AW8376 or so and any new GIs should be fine.

    From a practical side, I have 5 PTRs. 2 that had shallow flutes. One wears an RCM k barrel now, the other is a DMR and kept the TC barrel since it's a sub MOA roller locker and I didn't have the heart to change the bbl. out. One GI, which cracked the trunnion as one of the hardness problem guns, PTR fixed that in a week turn, and it's been fine since. 2 are late production guns, Post AW8376 or so for an MSG91 in battle rifle trim and a 16" GI with a full length cocking tube. I recently acquired the second GI and don't have time on it, but the MSG91 has been trouble free.

    If they don't have welded rails, they have MFI mounts bedded, but not glued, to the receivers with steel bed. All except the DMR with shallow flutes shoot all ammo just fine, including tar sealed and steel cased. The DMR runs suppressed most of the time with a #17 locking piece and a single stage heavy buffer. All have real paddle releases added. Just bite the bullet and get it done, it's the way the rifle was intended to be run. The heavy buffers from Ghilliebear are GTG...he makes them by welding two stock buffer bodies together, turning a new piston and adding a new spring pack. They are also a lot cheaper than real heavy buffers and easier to fit in most stocks. The ESSL type SEF levers are useful...I have no problem with the selector unless I'm prone, but then the extended helps. YMMV.

    While they are cheap, pick up extractors, extractor springs (You'll likely ruin one or two of these detail cleaning over the years), ejectors, firing pin and spring, and a recoil spring or two. If you are going to mess with the trigger at all, pick up an extra hammer and sear. Then...Rollers... +2, +4, +8 are in my stash, along with retainer plates and pins. I have a ton of stuff, but it's because I'm a roller gun nerd, not because I really need it.

    I got into these years ago, when commercially available 7.62 AR variants were dubious, at best. I like roller guns, but if I were starting over, I'd probably have a couple to play with and be more heavy on SCAR or AR variants in 7.62. My G3k clone, though, is one of my favorites, and just a fun gun that is rather effective.

    Mags aren't 99 cents anymore like when I bought most of mine, but they are still so cheap that it just doesn't make sense for us to bother making one. The gun is pretty forgiving as far as feeding, and I can't say I've ever had a failure to feed, even from really messed up mags. It's a big gaping hole to hit and an enormous bolt carrier slamming the rounds home, so it works. The BCG would likely also make a highly effective melee weapon. :-)
    Great post. Thanks for the write up. Making me think I might pick up the GI model after all.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Beyond OZ
    Posts
    153
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by sig1473 View Post
    Those were the older JLD stamped PTRs with serial numbers that started with A and AW. The chamber flutes weren't cut deep enough. I had 2 of them.
    I have JDL that i bought during the AWB, with the A serial # 5_ _ it has been flawless 6,000 rd of nothing but Nato Mil-Surp ammo. Mines a keeper. I put a B-Squared scope mount on it and a Leupold 3X9 VX1 on it.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    down by the river
    Posts
    543
    Feedback Score
    17 (100%)
    Duane probably takes the cake for posts on this but I will add one thing since it was mentioned.

    Most PTR guns come with a lower that is not a Navy lower. They look like Navy grips, but I am almost positive that they are SEF/123style internals. SEF or 123 trigger packs are not interchangeable with Navy trigger packs.

    So you can't buy a Navy housing and drop in your trigger pack. You can put a complete Navy group on the gun however.

    Someone please correct me if I mispoke.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    248
    Feedback Score
    12 (100%)
    I took my PTR trigger pack and put it in a semi-modified navy trigger housing. It works fine. I now have 1 safety positions and 2 semi only positions.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    3,091
    Feedback Score
    0
    I have two. One 16 in barrel with telescoping stock. One 18 in barrel with wide hg, bipod, and fixed stock. I like them the way I like an old car. The ergs are so outdated. If they have one with a rail get it, I HATE the claw mount option.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    down by the river
    Posts
    543
    Feedback Score
    17 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by ramairthree View Post
    I like them the way I like an old car. The ergs are so outdated.
    I am with you 100%! All the great old guns are in the same boat: G3, M14, FAL, etc.. They are all great basic grunt rifles. Left alone they do their intended role very well. Try to pimp them out to bring them forward into the 1970's or beyond and you will be constantly chasing standards set by more modern designs and constantly disappointed. Trying to make those old classics have the ergos and performance of an AR is like putting lipstick on a pig.

    All that being said, I still love shooting the classics.

Page 2 of 13 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •