MI M-LOK handguard

[Hemoglobin]

I like mine. Honestly, I haven't had a chance to get out much since I made the swap over to M-lok, but given the attachment system has been out for a while I would think it's okay for most people. You can feel the heat more than I could with my C4 rails when shooting without gloves.

[Cobrasks]

I had almost the exact same want list for a new rail a short time ago ,with the
exception being that I didn't feel a need for a full top rail for this one .

I gave the ALG M-Lok v2 a try .

I plan on putting ALG M-Lok V2s or V3s on all of my rifles from now on .

The V2 is just smooth everywhere after mounting a folding front sight .
No edges like the top rail , on M-lok rail sections ,or near the receiver like on the V0 .
IMHO -the lack of a full top rail makes the slightly larger diameter rail feel smaller
then those with the top rail while giving a little more room for the heat to escape .

I don't see the lack of M-Lok slots at 3 and 9 O'clock as a problem .
Once a good in-line light mount gets released ( Arisaka looks good)
I don't see a lot of use for 3 and 9 slots for me .

The lack of the extra slots also allows the rail to feel less angled .
It's shaped less like a stop sign and more like a circle -it's kind
of hard to show that with just pictures .

[nimdabew]

I bought the 11" SLR Lite M-Lok rail for $191 shipped today. I am going to weigh my upper before and after to see how much I lose, but I think it will be substantial since I am losing the suppressor mount, DD RIS II and associated excess metal.

[derfarhar333]

I love my MI handguard! It's 3"longer than the 12" quad that came on my rifle but 6.5 ozs lighter.

[djegators]

I see no reason not to get the MI, great product, reasonable price. Nothing wrong with the other options either.