Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4567 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 65

Thread: Melonite vs. Chrome Lined Longevity

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    401
    Feedback Score
    0
    I was wondering why nitrided 4150 is farther down the list than plain 4150. I understand that you can get better quality rifling on a stainless barrel. I thought the free machining 416R resulted in slightly better rifling than standard 416, but I could be wrong on that.

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    96
    Feedback Score
    0
    Faxon produces 416R QPQ barrels. My two are very accurate and I have no doubt the QPQ treatment will increase longevity. It also seems to give a slight increase in velocity.

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Western US
    Posts
    2,474
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Junkie View Post
    I was wondering why nitrided 4150 is farther down the list than plain 4150. I understand that you can get better quality rifling on a stainless barrel. I thought the free machining 416R resulted in slightly better rifling than standard 416, but I could be wrong on that.
    It's not lower on the list because it is less accurate, but because it is as close to exactly as accurate but with more durability/a longer lifespan.

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Northern UT
    Posts
    4,245
    Feedback Score
    69 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by BillyJack556 View Post
    Faxon produces 416R QPQ barrels. My two are very accurate and I have no doubt the QPQ treatment will increase longevity. It also seems to give a slight increase in velocity.
    Same here, I think Nathan said a life of 8-14k rounds expected life with a qpq 416r.
    I paint spaceship parts.

    Quote Originally Posted by Failure2Stop View Post
    Stippled Glocks are like used underwear; previous owner makes all the difference in value.

  5. #55
    FaxonNathan Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by BillyJack556 View Post
    Faxon produces 416R QPQ barrels. My two are very accurate and I have no doubt the QPQ treatment will increase longevity. It also seems to give a slight increase in velocity.
    That is correct. QPQ (or any of the nitrocarburization processes) imbunes Nitrogen into the steel, which increases surface hardness, increases dry lubricity, and significantly increases corrosion & abrasion resistance.

    As such, it results in the mentioned increase in longevity and velocity.

    Plus, it looks great!

  6. #56
    FaxonNathan Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Redstate View Post
    ColtSeavers, nice rundown. Now the question to you is how much more longevity in your order of barrel materials and finishes.
    In our experience (using semi-auto fire, AR-style weapon):

    4150 QPQ or Chrome**
    4140 QPQ or Chrome
    416-R QPQ
    ---Note there is a huge gap here in terms of longevity---
    Bare 4150
    Bare 4140
    Bare 416-R

    *In a non fully-automatic firearm, the difference in longevity in a bore between QPQ/Nitrocarburization is roughly the same to a "standard" chrome lining. QPQ will have more corrosion resistance through all stages of the barrel, where once chrome is worn through, the base metal is exposed.

    Chrome can be longer-lasting if applied "thick" which is very uncommon in MSR barrels. This is common to see in Machine Gun barrels (which we also manufacture). However, a thick chroming is very difficult to maintain MOA accuracy (again, why its used in Machine Guns).

  7. #57
    FaxonNathan Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Junkie View Post
    I haven't seen any claims of nitride reducing the accuracy of a barrel. While it makes it far more wear resistant, it doesn't really change dimensions. I could be wrong though.
    That is correct. QPQ as a process processes existing steel versus adding a coating on top of a steel. As such, dimensional change is negligible (assuming stress-relieved steel).

  8. #58
    FaxonNathan Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by MegademiC View Post
    How does chrome lining bond to nitride steel? Is it compromised at all from the carbon or nitride?
    We have not heard of this before. Primarily because chroming uses an "electropolish" in its process that eats away at the bore which the chrome replaces during coating.

    Would largely defeat the purpose of a Nitride process.

  9. #59
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    1,778
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by FaxonNathan View Post
    We have not heard of this before. Primarily because chroming uses an "electropolish" in its process that eats away at the bore which the chrome replaces during coating.

    Would largely defeat the purpose of a Nitride process.
    You can chrome plate over nitriding. It has some quirks, but it can be done and it will adhere well.

    And, since nitriding does not add material you could do the electro-polish on the bore before nitriding.

    The M256 120mm tank gun operates at 87,000 psi with propellant temperatures of 3300° to 3500° F, these are nitrided using an ion nitride process, then chrome plated. They still only last 1,500 effective full charge rounds....
    Last edited by lysander; 08-13-15 at 12:31.

  10. #60
    FaxonNathan Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by lysander View Post
    You can chrome plate over nitriding. It has some quirks, but it can be done and it will adhere well.

    And, since nitriding does not add material you could do the electro-polish on the bore before nitriding.

    The M256 120mm tank gun operates at 87,000 psi with propellant temperatures of 3300° to 3500° F, these are nitrided using an ion nitride process, then chrome plated. They still only last 1,500 effective full charge rounds....
    True, but would come at significant cost. Electropolishing is done at the chrome plater so unless your chromer is the same as your nitride house, there are significant lead-time and cost challenges.

    I can say we (Faxon) would not likely take this path unless one of our OEM customers asked us to do so for them. Just can't see the major benefit, especially with mis-match in abrasion resistances once the chrome is worked-through.

Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4567 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •