Thanks Larry.....I think the consensus is that the P250 is a turd and the P320 is a completely different animal.
Thanks Larry.....I think the consensus is that the P250 is a turd and the P320 is a completely different animal.
Define "turd." The Gen1 P250's had serious problems and would well deserve the moniker "turd" IMHO. However, the Gen2 has been unfairly painted w/the Gen1's brush. I've owned several P250's and all have been reliable & accurate. If you don't like or can't handle a DAO trigger then the P250 isn't for you. However, a DAO trigger doesn't make it a "turd."
Tomac
"His Universe, His rules." - Tomac
I always own several of my primary SD/EDC handgun. I currently use 3 P320's in rotation; one for training/backup, one for nightstand duty and one for EDC. This allows me to spread out the wear, ensure fresh lube and identify/rectify problems during the training segment before it rotates to EDC.
Tomac
"His Universe, His rules." - Tomac
The P250 may in fact be a better gun now but life ain't fair and many times flawed designs don't get second chances - with as many good handgun options on the market today why should we all stop what we are doing and give SIG a second chance on a gun that had major fleas from the start ?
I think the P320 addressed many of the concerns about the P250, and is the evolution of the product line. I personally would regard the P250 as a big step backwards.
Listen. Tell. Run Like Hell.
I have personally witnessed two 250s on separate occasions failing to fire. You could pull the trigger till it stopped on the frame and it never fully actuated the hammer, so it never fell.
I would never own a 250 after seeing that.
The 320 is however a completely different animal.
Dont sweat the small stuff.
If youre not taking fire, its all small stuff.
Bookmarks