Originally Posted by
Hmac
Your particular situation notwithstanding, statistically, the risks and complications to one's vision is greater with contact lenses than it is with LASIK or PRK.
Depending partially on age, phakik intraocular lens implantation is potentially an excellent alternative to LASIK/PRK for vision/astigmatism correction, with a lower complication rate. Corneal thickness and other such abnormalities don't matter in that case.
.
Yeah, I get the contact danger. You basically have a piece of plastic over your cornea (I know, oversimplification). It has the distinct possibility of holding something to get your eye infected, or something to scratch it. Plus, the risks of constantly sticking your fingers in your eyes.
My particular situation was working in industrial machine shops, and later a job out on a river working on power line tower bases. More risk than probably the average person.
Never heard of the implantation thing. Is that similar to the cornea implant to correct cataracts? If so, from my understanding, insurance typically won't cover it unless you actually have cataracts.
I don't have that kind of change.
Sent from my SGP612 using Tapatalk
Last edited by Gunfixr; 09-05-15 at 21:23.
NRA Life, SASS#40701, Glock Advanced Armorer
Gunsmith for Unique Armament Creations LLC, 07/SOT
VIGILIA PRETIUM LIBERTATIS
Bookmarks