so I recently replied to someone's thread about how my 9MM AR (CMMG MK9 Pistol) didn't do so well with the cheaper 115gr FMJ ammo. it did not have enough "uumph" to cycle the bolt all the way back to were it would catch the next round out of the mag with enough force. The gun runs great with 124 grain FMJ ammo and the hotter stuff. In regards to people braking bolt catches due to over rearward travel of the bolt, I am finding that a lot of people are using either the stacked quarters with the standard length CMMG buffer or the spacer you can buy or they are buying the longer and heavier buffer and some are also getting a "heavier" spring. All of this is to reduce the rearward travel of the bolt so it doesn't slam into the bolt catch and possibly brake it and damage your lower. CMMG dose not use a longer Buffer OR a spacer for their 9mm AR pistol, just a slightly heavier one (5.3oz)
My question is, If we all used heavier buffers, put spacers in the tube and or used stronger springs to correct the over travel issue because of the shorter 9MM round wouldn't that make it even harder to get 115gr FMJ ammo to cycle the bolt far enough? it would have to, it has more resistance no matter witch way you decide to fix the over travel problem.
EDIT: I did contact CMMG about this and they said that they are using a thicker bolt catch so it is stronger. seems like a Band Aid fix to me.
Bookmarks