Page 5 of 16 FirstFirst ... 3456715 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 153

Thread: Any drone enthusiast/hobbiest?

  1. #41
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    midwest
    Posts
    8,217
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Moose-Knuckle View Post
    Well that is no longer a UAV is it? I guess we finally have are flying cars gents.
    Drone with passenger. It's entirely autonomous...doesn't even have an opportunity to control it.

    The advantage to autonomous flight planning is the elimination of humans wandering into airspace where they shouldn't either because it's restricted or because there is other air traffic. That would be controllable by ATC or by the networked flight programming, either before or during the flight. The computer route for the drone would be networked so that its route can be designed not to conflict with other traffic.

    The concept looks really cool, just like every other flying car system out there. The technology to build it exists and would be relatively easy to implement, in fact already has been implemented. To do so economically (especially if the thing has a one-passenger payload) is very problematic, and even more so when we begin to figure out how these fit within the national airspace system.

    China is one thing. Don't look for these anytime soon in the US. Regulatory hurdles will be profound.
    Last edited by Hmac; 01-08-16 at 11:37.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Atlanta, Georgia
    Posts
    9,603
    Feedback Score
    47 (100%)
    I would be 100% behind passenger drones if there was a failsafe mode where the passenger could move from passive to active control of the unit. Or, for licensed pilots, a manual version.

    Quote Originally Posted by Hmac View Post
    Drone with passenger. It's entirely autonomous...doesn't even have an opportunity to control it.

    The advantage to autonomous flight planning is the elimination of humans wandering into airspace where they shouldn't either because it's restricted or because there is other air traffic. That would be controllable by ATC or by the networked flight programming, either before or during the flight. The computer route for the drone would be networked so that its route can be designed not to conflict with other traffic.

    The concept looks really cool, just like every other flying car system out there. The technology to build it exists and would be relatively easy to implement, in fact already has been implemented. To do so economically (especially if the thing has a one-passenger payload) is very problematic, and even more so when we begin to figure out how these fit within the national airspace system.

    China is one thing. Don't look for these anytime soon in the US. Regulatory hurdles will be profound.

  3. #43
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    midwest
    Posts
    8,217
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Outlander Systems View Post
    I would be 100% behind passenger drones if there was a failsafe mode where the passenger could move from passive to active control of the unit. Or, for licensed pilots, a manual version.
    Or a ballistic parachute and minimum 500 foot transit altitude.

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    1,571
    Feedback Score
    12 (93%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Hmac View Post
    Or a ballistic parachute and minimum 500 foot transit altitude.
    The Cirrus SR22 needs more than 500 feet to deploy parachute doesn't it?

  5. #45
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    midwest
    Posts
    8,217
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by elephant View Post
    The Cirrus SR22 needs more than 500 feet to deploy parachute doesn't it?
    Yes, but I was thinking more along the lines of a Second Chantz system. I'm guessing an ultra light system would be more suitable.

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    1,571
    Feedback Score
    12 (93%)
    I guess autorotation is out of the question then?

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    3,403
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Hmac View Post
    Drone with passenger. It's entirely autonomous...doesn't even have an opportunity to control it.

    The advantage to autonomous flight planning is the elimination of humans wandering into airspace where they shouldn't either because it's restricted or because there is other air traffic. That would be controllable by ATC or by the networked flight programming, either before or during the flight. The computer route for the drone would be networked so that its route can be designed not to conflict with other traffic.

    The concept looks really cool, just like every other flying car system out there. The technology to build it exists and would be relatively easy to implement, in fact already has been implemented. To do so economically (especially if the thing has a one-passenger payload) is very problematic, and even more so when we begin to figure out how these fit within the national airspace system.

    China is one thing. Don't look for these anytime soon in the US. Regulatory hurdles will be profound.
    It's all fun and games till the blue screen of death turns into the pink stain of death.

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Atlanta, Georgia
    Posts
    9,603
    Feedback Score
    47 (100%)
    Thanks for the LOLz!

    That was classic.

    Quote Originally Posted by TAZ View Post
    It's all fun and games till the blue screen of death turns into the pink stain of death.

  9. #49
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    midwest
    Posts
    8,217
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by elephant View Post
    I guess autorotation is out of the question then?
    Fixed pitch props. It would drop like a rock.

  10. #50
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    midwest
    Posts
    8,217
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by TAZ View Post
    It's all fun and games till the blue screen of death turns into the pink stain of death.
    Oh yeah. You could have redundant electronics easy enough, but motors and batteries are heavy so backups would be problematic...lose one of those and time to hit the silk AFAIK.
    Last edited by Hmac; 01-08-16 at 22:03.

Page 5 of 16 FirstFirst ... 3456715 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •