It's purely speculation on my part, but given what the disparity I've seen in reliability from ETS vs Magpul Glock mags, I'm willing to bet Magpul didn't simply forget to make the GL9 PMAG 21 hold 22 rounds.
The obedient always think of themselves as virtuous rather than the cowards they really are.
Hey guys I don't want to hijack this thread but if you have one of our 22 round mags and it won't hold 22 rounds please contact us for a spring replacement. We will be happy to replace it for you.
I would say that Magpul pulled an H&K: They prioritized function over capacity.
22-rounds in an ETS are difficult to seat in the gun, swell slightly (preventing fully loaded magazines from dropping freely - although I don't know why you would need one to), and have had issues with springs (which ETS has been great about addressing as the issue arises).
" Nil desperandum - Never Despair. That is a motto for you and me. All are not dead; and where there is a spark of patriotic fire, we will rekindle it. "
- Samuel Adams -
Funny my ETS mags have been as reliable as my Magpul mags - and let not forget that all companies have had issues with new products in the past - be in magazines, BUIS, you name it.
Both Magpul and ETS have done a great job addressing those when they come up, so in the end pick the one you like and move on.
Maybe, maybe not. The Glock PMAG design seems to have a very thick basepad which likely costs them length and room. On the 15rd mags it's obnoxiously long IMO, to the point I will use the 4 Magpuls I have take out of the package, but the rest will stay in storage, as I prefer the form factor of OEM and ETS magazines much better - all have functioned with the same reliability for me (ie not caused any failures - only cheap / weak ammo as caused those).
Bookmarks