Page 4 of 9 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 87

Thread: Vltor A5 vs. Geissele Super 42, which is better?

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,312
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Somebody tell G to make a rifle length braided wire spring so we can test it in the A5RE.

    Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    1,404
    Feedback Score
    77 (100%)
    I don't think it would work with the a5 buffer


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,312
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Interesting, if it were the correct length, why not?

    Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    1,404
    Feedback Score
    77 (100%)

    Vltor A5 vs. Geissele Super 42, which is better?

    Because the spring is thicker. The carbine one doesn't work with carbine buffer either. It's a proprietary buffer that's smaller in diameter to compensate for the spring.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,312
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Ah, gotcha. Didn't notice that.

    Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    569
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks to all for responding. So basically the Geissele spring will last longer but doesn't improve reliability or reduce bolt bounce?

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    6,762
    Feedback Score
    11 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by HansTheHobbit View Post
    Thanks to all for responding. So basically the Geissele spring will last longer but doesn't improve reliability or reduce bolt bounce?
    It's a little stiffer than mil-spec, which is good. I find that mil-spec springs don't get it done for me in my AR's.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,114
    Feedback Score
    0
    From your video on another thread here. It may be helpful to look into what others are doing without requiring the need to increase L1 action spring tension to this point. That and using the FA without needed results. There are some issues here that are not inline with others in use.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    6,762
    Feedback Score
    11 (100%)
    Dunno what thay would be. All testing I've seen shows inadequacy of the milspec spring. It's about 400% less consistent in cyclic rate, too, due to variance when stripping rounds in full auto fire. It's just anemic.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    569
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by WS6 View Post
    Dunno what thay would be. All testing I've seen shows inadequacy of the milspec spring. It's about 400% less consistent in cyclic rate, too, due to variance when stripping rounds in full auto fire. It's just anemic.
    I think those are just problems associated with the carbine length systems in general. You have a weaker spring combined with half the mass in the buffer. I've been told it's something to do with the compression rate, but I'm pretty vague on that term.

    Looks like I will be going with the A5.

Page 4 of 9 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •