Originally Posted by
wrx04
My main carry gun is a gen 3 G19, but i carry a Kahr PM9 or SW 642 when deep concealment is needed. Recently, ive been contemplating selling a few guns and consolidate to the glock 9mm platform. I definitely would like to pick up a LAV G19 when they become available (i like the RTF) but was debating if i should get a 43. The PM9 has been very reliable, but had a couple high angle FTF's that just never sat well with me.
My question is, should i get a 43 for the times the 19 is too big, or can i just roll with a 642? I love the reliability of the small revolver, but its tough to shoot, slow to reload, and a bitch to get a ton of rounds through. It is a great "close range one bad guy" type situation, but a 43 is a little more shootable with quicker reloads.
I've had a love affair with the 642. It's an awesome little gun. I carried a 642 or a 340PD for 15 years. I don't own one anymore. I miss it at times. Very light gun but five rounds sucks. You don't get to choose only one bad guy. I carried a speed strip on my belt and two in the pocket. 20 rounds was respectable. I carry a S&W Shield in 9mm now. It a little bugger but fits my hand better.
"Real men have always needed to know what time it is so they are at the airfield on time, pumping rounds into savages at the right time, etc. Being able to see such in the dark while light weights were comfy in bed without using a light required luminous material." -Originally Posted by ramairthree
Bookmarks