Originally Posted by
pointblank4445
Wanted to bump this thread just to say thanks to NongShim for doing this write up and giving me just enough to push me into giving the SR25 a second chance and looking past my love/hate relationship with KAC and their products. I opted for the ACC in MLok and so far my only problems encountered have been with some factory mags not being in spec (currently they are with KAC). I fitted my gun with a 1.5-8x26mm S&B Short Dot. Other than getting the gun set up, I have had only 3 major outings and 400 rounds on it this past month.
Outing 1: Zeroing, 0-100y carbine work. The lightweight ACC is noticeably lighter and easier to drive off hand than the EMC I had previously.
Outing 2: 100-300y standing, barricade supported, prone sans bipod, tripod engagement of 8" and 10" steel circles.
Outing 3: 315 - 815y on 2/3 ipsc steel target engagement off of pack.
Thus far, the ACC has done everything I've asked of it and has far exceeded my expectations; however, some credit must be given to the optic as well. With so many failures and disappointments in semi-auto 308's and lightweight guns, the ACC is off to a very good start out of the gate.
I've followed your S&B comparison on Lightfighter. What are your thoughts on the SD 1.5-8 on the ACC? Are you still in favor of the SD 1.5-8 over the SD 1-8?
Last edited by JoshNC; 02-18-17 at 12:18.
SLG Defense 07/02 FFL/SOT
Bookmarks