Originally Posted by
Inkslinger
My thought process is that an "untrained", as in knowing there's a major artery in the leg, but not necessarily where, could be more successful in stopping bleeding with a device (even a belt and not a tacticool TQ) that encompasses the entire area more effectively than focusing pressure with the hands in an area they hope is correct.
TQ's have enjoyed a resurgence in popularity largely due to their performance during the GWOT. However, what is good for the goose is not always good for the gander. During the GWOT, the IED introduced an injury pattern ideal for the TQ - massive, bilateral lower extremity trauma with complex vascular injuries. Many times soldiers would lose 25%+ of their blood volume in an instant as both legs were amputated. How is 1 medic going to apply pressure to both lower extremities on 1 patient when there were several other equally critical patients? How about applying pressure on a patient while firing your weapon or reloading? Fortunately, that injury pattern is exceedingly rare in the US.
So, the TQ served as a lifesaving force multiplier that was good enough but far from ideal. Fast forward a decade and people who saw the TQ save lives in the sandbox are now applying those lessons state side. Unfortunately, I'm seeing A LOT of TQ's applied inappropriately or on wounds that do not involve serious bleeding. Are they harming people? Rarely. But they certainly are not helping.
So yes. I keep a TQ along with an Israeli Combat Dressing in my kit. However, I invision it being used when faced with a situation where there are more injuries than hands or all hands are preoccupied trying to prevent further injury.
Last edited by Sensei; 11-14-16 at 19:39.
I like my rifles like my women - short, light, fast, brown, and suppressed.
Bookmarks