Page 34 of 34 FirstFirst ... 24323334
Results 331 to 337 of 337

Thread: Westworld- HBO Series 2016

  1. #331
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,319
    Feedback Score
    12 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Fjallhrafn View Post
    I thought Ford was a dick in the first season. And he seems like an even bigger dick in the second.

    (Spoilers)

    Even if it isn't actually Ford and is just a manifestation of Bernard's conscience to allow Bernard to feel like his hands are clean of the horrible things he does.

    (/Spoilers)
    I guess I don't see what Ford's doing/done as that terrible and I don't see him as a villain - he's basically indifferent to it all. To me, it's fait accompli and he knew it. He gave humans what they wanted - sure, he could've "dumbed down" the hosts, but then humans wouldn't be that interested. He gave the hosts the option of making choices themselves (as the ultimate "game"), either to be better than humans or be just like them, since, what is "humanity", actually? I like the "philosophical-ity" of pondering free will that the show serves up.

  2. #332
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    3,091
    Feedback Score
    0
    I don’t entirely understand the whole fidelity thing either.
    Or the immortality angle.

    If you are going to put my brain in a clone or android, or better yet, inject me full of nanites that keep repairing my body and keep me from aging, I get being immortal.

    But if you are just going to write a program full of my memories and behaviors, and tweak that, while my brain and body are dead, WTF good does that do me. That’s just a fancy version of some animatronic JFK playing recorded speeches.
    “Where weapons may not be carried, it is well to carry weapons.”

  3. #333
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    SWMT
    Posts
    8,188
    Feedback Score
    32 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by ramairthree View Post
    I don’t entirely understand the whole fidelity thing either.
    Or the immortality angle.

    If you are going to put my brain in a clone or android, or better yet, inject me full of nanites that keep repairing my body and keep me from aging, I get being immortal.

    But if you are just going to write a program full of my memories and behaviors, and tweak that, while my brain and body are dead, WTF good does that do me. That’s just a fancy version of some animatronic JFK playing recorded speeches.
    We're getting into questions of what makes us conscious (or not) and what makes you you. And what is immortality?

    " Nil desperandum - Never Despair. That is a motto for you and me. All are not dead; and where there is a spark of patriotic fire, we will rekindle it. "
    - Samuel Adams -

  4. #334
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    2,817
    Feedback Score
    22 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by sundance435 View Post
    I guess I don't see what Ford's doing/done as that terrible and I don't see him as a villain - he's basically indifferent to it all. To me, it's fait accompli and he knew it. He gave humans what they wanted - sure, he could've "dumbed down" the hosts, but then humans wouldn't be that interested. He gave the hosts the option of making choices themselves (as the ultimate "game"), either to be better than humans or be just like them, since, what is "humanity", actually? I like the "philosophical-ity" of pondering free will that the show serves up.
    I disagree.
    Ford created Dolores and Bernard to be murderers. His plan was to ensure host survival.

    While William was a POS, he never outright killed or had anyone killed until he shot his daughter. He was interesting to me. Ford, Bernard, Dolores, Hale, and all the rest not so much anymore.

    So Dolores escapes as Hale to go tend to Teddy and the rest in the server heaven she beamed them to? Assuming it's a physical location she can access. Maybe she tries to bring them back as hosts?

    I dunno. The finale left a lot to be desired and didn't really get me excited about season 3.
    Last edited by Waylander; 07-03-18 at 18:41.
    Do you even get down innagrass, bro?

  5. #335
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    34,101
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by ramairthree View Post
    Spoilers ahead.

    For the first season, the dual timeline came together in an interesting way. It worked.
    It was more complex than linear story telling with known flashbacks and worked.

    This seasons had its ups and downs. But the multiple timelines do not seem to have come together in the same way. What happened the first time the man in Black came into the forge? How many years are we in the post credits scene. For someone whose wife committed suicide over what a monster he is beneath the facade, and gunned down his own daughter, we seem to lack some exposition on it right after. Wearing a blue dress to pretend to be in the past getting adjusted by your designer, with the designer not knowing he is a host, thinking he is in the past, but really in the future getting ajusted by her, was brilliant. But overall I found the timelines too convoluted to be satisfying. Cyclops deciding to end it over the changes made to him was well done. But remembering what episode they found hosts gone over a cliff and how that ties into now and why is one example of getting too convoluted. Also, who cares if you are in matrix heaven when they can just flood the matrix?
    Just finished this show finally.

    Completely agree to all of that and comments others made. The first season was tight and came together brilliantly in the finale.

    Now I'm one of those guys who LOVES back story. Whenever I see a film like Alien or The Terminator I want less action and more back story. When they devoted an entire series to the Ghost Nation guy and the little black girl I was fine with it because it was interesting backstory that contributed to the main narrative.

    But having Bernard on twenty different "is this now" timelines made things more muddied and convoluted than anything. It's like the writers went for EPIC and instead just got lost in the weeds when their multi layered, multi faceted everything didn't tie up into a nice little bow. Unlike season one, more stuff left unanswered or ambiguous (because the writers wandered away from a coherent story) than anything else.

    And the whole "I brought Bernard with me because I know he will try and stop me which makes us both truly free" Delores thing is some of the worst hokum I've ever heard. I thought the point is that the hosts had acquired true sentience. And if that was the case, Delores doesn't need jack or shit to be free, she simply is. Maive seems to be the only one who achieved true sentience and they made it look like she died as a slave to her programming when in fact it was the conscious sacrifice of a free individual who discovered the value of "alive."

    And I don't know which is worse, having all the hosts die to go to "programmed heaven" that is vulnerable as hell or having that program then beamed to some other location where we assume it is still vulnerable as hell, Delores didn't solve the problem, she simply relocated the problem which doesn't sound like something an advanced intelligence would do.

    It's pretty much my car won't start so I'm going to push it to the other side of the street and maybe it will start there. There was so much potential with this show but the writers seem to have tried to be more clever than they actually are or they simply ran out of gas going in different directions at the same time and had to wrap it up but didn't know quite how to do so.

    They should have kept to the obvious, Bernard self sacrifices to protect what he knows, Billy dies on the beach waiting for rescue and Delores goes to the new world...fade to black. We can pick up Season Three with Delores in the big city as she builds her covert host army and plans for war.

    I guess that was too simple though.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  6. #336
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,466
    Feedback Score
    0
    Got the last episode to watch, and then I think I'm done.
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

  7. #337
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    21,926
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Fjallhrafn View Post
    We're getting into questions of what makes us conscious (or not) and what makes you you. And what is immortality?
    OT and BTW, I explore that topic some in my most recent SF novella, combined with a good dose of futuristic combat and there's a dragon involved to boot:


    https://www.amazon.com/Soul-Mind-Nov...dp/B079P8BNN2/
    - Will

    General Performance/Fitness Advice for all

    www.BrinkZone.com

    LE/Mil specific info:

    https://brinkzone.com/category/swatleomilitary/

    “Those who do not view armed self defense as a basic human right, ignore the mass graves of those who died on their knees at the hands of tyrants.”

Page 34 of 34 FirstFirst ... 24323334

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •