hearing protection act

[Furbyballer]

Frankly, if we did get the money back from stamp purchases I would take all the money and donate it back to SiCo or another organization working to remove SBRs/SBS/AOWs from the NFA as well.

[daniel87]

Frankly, if we did get the money back from stamp purchases I would take all the money and donate it back to SiCo or another organization working to remove SBRs/SBS/AOWs from the NFA as well.

Donate to them by buying more silencers

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

[Furbyballer]

Donate to them by buying more silencers

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

I mean, that was a given. Im sooooo far down that rabbit hole already haha

[skywalkrNCSU]

I'm pretty content with my versatile 30 cal and 45 ACP cans. Might still get a .22 can but if this actually passed I would go broke. I would definitely have one for every gun and then some.

[tostado22]

I've got too many irons in the fire right now to start buying up cans too lol. My Rep is already I cosponsor. May drop a line just to show there is some support here

[shadow93]

I'm all for this, except IL would still need to legalize them being allowed anyways correct?

[t15]

I think this would be transfered as "other" on the form. Not sure what that would mean, Illinois will probably still prohibit.

[A5scott]

yes, you would need IL congress to get a bill going if one isn't already. As far as I know, all NFA items are banned in IL. lifting the ban on suppressors would be a good start. I don't live in Chicago anymore, but I still own a home there and I would love to see some progress in this area.

scott

[WickedWillis]

I haven't played in the NFA game yet, but I am gearing up to. This cause is a no-brainer for any 2A supporter

[w3453l]

Of all those things I'd like to see suppressors removed from NFA. However I don't think they should need to be transferred thru dealers, nor should they require NICS. They should be treated as more expensive flash hiders and brakes. Although I know: baby steps.