New here.

[HeruMew]

I smell troll... OP EDC'a a 1905 smith in 32-20? Right....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I've had a hard time with this one for my troll-o-meter.

I feel like he isn't being a troll, persay, but has a very unique opinion set when comparing to the average member on here.

But the AR. I will be very candid. I don't like them, and will have this trainer for sale the MINUTE I retire. Times may change, but physics doesn't. 147 or 168 grain bullets have more energy and killing power at any given range, and .308 bullets make bigger holes. But for now, I need to be able to show up on orders and deliver the goods; no notice, no problem. If I could find a local expert that wouldn't try and feed me the kool-aid (AR is the greatest weapons system EVAR), I would certainly be interested.

Being forthright:
All ballistic variants have their ups and downs, but discrediting a service rifle because of how it feels compared to an M1 and then stating that it wasnt evolutionary in any way has me believing you may be one of the types of folks you so despise about the AR platform, but for the M1.

[plain old dave]

Just to be accurate, it's a 1905 4th Change Hand Ejector in .32-20. Made c. 1925, and stoked with handloads from before the loading manual publishers got frilly drawers. Would upload a pic, but tapatalk won't let me. Takes forever to make posts on this thing.



Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk

[travistheone]

thanks for the interesting read